linux-kernel - Re: [LKP] [mtd] 6b44d910ae7: WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 0 at kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3547 check

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAH6sp9PsQHzT6aos-HHND-G_DGzak-70vH9fXFx8-0Hbdc9j1Q@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Fri, 17 Apr 2015 16:19:52 +0200
From:	Frans Klaver <fransklaver@...il.com>
To:	Huang Ying <ying.huang@...el.com>
Cc:	Brian Norris <computersforpeace@...il.com>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, LKP ML <lkp@...org>
Subject: Re: [LKP] [mtd] 6b44d910ae7: WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 0 at
 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3547 check_flags+0xae/0x17b()

On Thu, Apr 16, 2015 at 9:34 AM, Frans Klaver <fransklaver@...il.com> wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 16, 2015 at 7:27 AM, Huang Ying <ying.huang@...el.com> wrote:
>> FYI, we noticed the below changes on
>>
>> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/next/linux-next.git master
>> commit 6b44d910ae7de5316fcf1fc828ff4a8d48cac5e2 ("mtd: core: set some defaults when dev.parent is set")
>>
>> <panic>
>
> I would then expect that this is actually caused by
> 29b4dacc55b0cb079e5b4be2fbc494e138a7d110 (mtd: nand: docg4: show
> parent device in sysfs), which effectively replaces mtd->owner with
> the automated value. I just noticed that
> module_platform_driver_probe() doesn't set the owner like
> module_platform_driver() does.

Or not. I should probably get more sleep somewhere. omap2 uses
module_platform_driver but still requires .driver.owner to be set to
THIS_MODULE.

>From the looks of it only platform_driver_register() provides the
nicety of automatically filling in the module owner. This still seems
to be an API inconsistency to me.

> I'm happy to
> send in a patch that restores "mtd->owner = THIS_MODULE" with these
> drivers, if that's preferred.

Long story short, I should fix it.

Brian, do you prefer a rework of the series or a patch fixing it?

Frans
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/