[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.LNX.2.00.1504172055570.3695@pobox.suse.cz>
Date: Fri, 17 Apr 2015 20:59:39 +0200 (CEST)
From: Jiri Kosina <jkosina@...e.cz>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>
cc: linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH] thp: cleanup how khugepaged enters freezer
khugepaged_do_scan() checks in every iteration whether freezing(current)
is true, and in such case breaks out of the loop, which causes
try_to_freeze() to be called immediately afterwards in
khugepaged_wait_work().
If nothing else, this causes unnecessary freezing(current) test, and also
makes the way khugepaged enters freezer a bit less obvious than necessary.
Let's just try to freeze directly, instead of splitting it into two
(directly adjacent) phases.
Signed-off-by: Jiri Kosina <jkosina@...e.cz>
---
Stumbled upon this when debugging something completely unrelated.
mm/huge_memory.c | 4 +---
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/mm/huge_memory.c b/mm/huge_memory.c
index 078832c..b3d8cd8 100644
--- a/mm/huge_memory.c
+++ b/mm/huge_memory.c
@@ -2799,7 +2799,7 @@ static void khugepaged_do_scan(void)
cond_resched();
- if (unlikely(kthread_should_stop() || freezing(current)))
+ if (unlikely(kthread_should_stop() || try_to_freeze()))
break;
spin_lock(&khugepaged_mm_lock);
@@ -2820,8 +2820,6 @@ static void khugepaged_do_scan(void)
static void khugepaged_wait_work(void)
{
- try_to_freeze();
-
if (khugepaged_has_work()) {
if (!khugepaged_scan_sleep_millisecs)
return;
--
Jiri Kosina
SUSE Labs
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists