[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CANMBJr4eZ_y6Sp+9t51QpKSwCEyvZVbj7BZ7G5JDqbp+vxB3GA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 17 Apr 2015 15:35:19 -0700
From: Tyler Baker <tyler.baker@...aro.org>
To: Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net>
Cc: Shuah Khan <shuahkh@....samsung.com>,
Kevin Hilman <khilman@...nel.org>,
John Stultz <john.stultz@...aro.org>,
Darren Hart <dvhart@...radead.org>,
David Herrmann <dh.herrmann@...il.com>,
Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 7/8] selftest/x86: install tests
On 17 April 2015 at 15:28, Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net> wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 17, 2015 at 3:02 PM, Tyler Baker <tyler.baker@...aro.org> wrote:
>> Include lib.mk and set TEST_PROGS where appropriate. Skip the install and test
>> case when CROSS_COMPILE is not set.
>>
>> Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net>
>> Signed-off-by: Tyler Baker <tyler.baker@...aro.org>
>> ---
>> tools/testing/selftests/x86/Makefile | 9 +++++++++
>> 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/x86/Makefile b/tools/testing/selftests/x86/Makefile
>> index 9962e10..622717e 100644
>> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/x86/Makefile
>> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/x86/Makefile
>> @@ -12,19 +12,28 @@ UNAME_M := $(shell uname -m)
>> ifeq ($(CROSS_COMPILE),)
>> # Always build 32-bit tests
>> all: all_32
>> +# Install 32-bit tests
>> +TEST_PROGS += $(BINARIES_32) run_x86_tests.sh
>> # If we're on a 64-bit host, build 64-bit tests as well
>> ifeq ($(UNAME_M),x86_64)
>> all: all_32 all_64
>> +# Install 64-bit tests
>> +TEST_PROGS += $(BINARIES_64)
>> endif
>> else
>> # No dependency on all when cross building
>> all:
>> +# Skip install and test case when not built
>> +override INSTALL_RULE :=
>> +override EMIT_TESTS := echo "echo \"selftests: run_x86_tests.sh [SKIP]\""
>
> I may just be confused, but why is an emply TEST_PROGS insufficient?
This is a good question. The default install in lib.mk rule blindly
calls 'install -t <INSTALL_PATH> <TEST_PROG>' which fails the install
as it is not enough arguments passed. Perhaps we fix this behavior in
lib.mk.
>
> --Andy
>
>> endif
>>
>> all_32: check_build32 $(BINARIES_32)
>>
>> all_64: $(BINARIES_64)
>>
>> +include ../lib.mk
>> +
>> clean:
>> $(RM) $(BINARIES_32) $(BINARIES_64)
>>
>> --
>> 2.1.4
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Andy Lutomirski
> AMA Capital Management, LLC
--
Tyler Baker
Tech Lead, LAVA
Linaro.org | Open source software for ARM SoCs
Follow Linaro: http://www.facebook.com/pages/Linaro
http://twitter.com/#!/linaroorg - http://www.linaro.org/linaro-blog
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists