linux-kernel - Re: [GIT PULL] PMEM driver for v4.1

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CA+55aFwaGWK-hpTWXD8YH0jHVdeJU1nd6uOpzqOp0gUT8RUSTg@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Sat, 18 Apr 2015 11:42:27 -0400
From:	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
To:	Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
Cc:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	linux-nvdimm@...ts.01.org,
	Ross Zwisler <ross.zwisler@...ux.intel.com>,
	Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>,
	Boaz Harrosh <boaz@...xistor.com>
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] PMEM driver for v4.1

On Fri, Apr 17, 2015 at 2:38 AM, Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de> wrote:
> So we'be been busy discussing future steps in this thread for a few days,
> but it seems like Linus doesn't like the pull request.  Linus, can you
> say what you don't like here?

I basically don't do pulls that generate a lot of discussion before
the discussion is over.

Of course, most of the time that discussion is because the pull
request itself is contentious. This time it seems to be more about
secondary issues related to the area rather than the pull request
itself being contentious. I assume nobody is actually objecting to the
pull itself, and will be going ahead with it.

         Linus
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/