lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Sat, 18 Apr 2015 08:05:10 -0400
From:	Sowmini Varadhan <>
To:	Guenter Roeck <>
	"David S. Miller" <>,
Subject: Re: sparc64: Build failure due to commit f1600e549b94 (sparc: Make
 sparc64 use scalable lib/iommu-common.c functions)

On (04/17/15 22:47), Guenter Roeck wrote:
> The problem is caused by commit f1600e549b94 ("sparc: Make sparc64
> use scalable lib/iommu-common.c functions"), which introduces 
> static DEFINE_PER_CPU(unsigned int, iommu_pool_hash);

I have to confess that I'm a little confused about what happened here..

The specific patch (2/3) above should have come from this submission

This does not add any additional defines for iommu_pool_hash.

It also does not have any references to fields like page_table_map_base:
instead, these were switched over to things like:
-	*dma_addrp = (iommu->page_table_map_base +
+	*dma_addrp = (iommu->tbl.table_map_base +
 		      ((iopte - iommu->page_table) << IO_PAGE_SHIFT));

But when I clone 
and do a git show of the commit-id above, I see deltas that
dont make sense (they seem to be from a patchset from somewhere
in the middle of the review chain from the thread). 

What am I missing? 


To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

Powered by blists - more mailing lists