[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <7401865.1Pb83TJP0q@wuerfel>
Date: Sun, 19 Apr 2015 21:47:52 +0200
From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
To: linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Cc: Javier González <javier@...igon.com>,
Valentin Manea <valentin.manea@...wei.com>,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, emmanuel.michel@...com,
Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
jean-michel.delorme@...com, tpmdd-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net,
Jens Wiklander <jens.wiklander@...aro.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 2/2] tee: add OP-TEE driver
On Sunday 19 April 2015 13:17:20 Javier González wrote:
>
> Only providing user space support would defeat one of the main purposes
> of the driver. We could better organize the patches and divide them into user
> space support and in-kernel support if that is what you mean. In the end
> the interfaces are orthogonal, even though the functionality should be very
> similar.
Splitting up the patches to separate the user interface from the in-kernel
interface is certainly a good idea, but aside from that, I also agree with
Greg on this point: if you want to establish an in-kernel interface, don't
add any dead code at the beginning, but add it together with the users
of that interface.
Arnd
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists