lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20150419034202.GC10169@danjae.kornet>
Date:	Sun, 19 Apr 2015 12:42:02 +0900
From:	Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>
To:	Taewoong Song <treeze.taeung@...il.com>
Cc:	Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	jolsa@...hat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] perf tools: Add a option 'remove' to perf-config and
 features which get or set a config variable.

On Sat, Apr 18, 2015 at 02:02:17PM +0900, Taewoong Song wrote:
> > On Apr 13, 2015, at 3:55 PM, Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org> wrote:
> > On Sun, Apr 12, 2015 at 11:44:49PM +0900, Taeung Song wrote:
> >> +static struct config_section *find_config_section(const char *section_name)
> >> +{
> >> +	struct config_section *section_node;
> > 
> > It'd be better to split declaration and function body with a blank line.
> > 
> 
> Does mean it like followed by ?
> 
> +static struct config_section *find_config_section(const char *section_name)
> +
> +{
> +	struct config_section *section_node;
> 
> ,or is it ?  
> 
> +static struct config_section *find_config_section(const char *section_name)
> +{
> +
> +	struct config_section *section_node;

Nope!  I meant

static struct config_section *find_config_section(const char *section_name)
{
	struct config_section *section node
								<-- here
	list_for_each_entry(section_node, &sections, list)
		...
}


> 
> > 
> >> +	list_for_each_entry(section_node, &sections, list)
> >> +		if (!strcmp(section_node->name, section_name))
> >> +			return section_node;
> >> +
> >> +	return NULL;
> >> +}
> >> +
> >> +static struct config_element *find_config_element(const char *subkey
> >> +						  , struct config_section *section_node)

And this is not how we put comma, please change it to

static struct config_element *find_config_element(const char *subkey,
						  struct config_section *section_node)

Ditto for others..

Thanks,
Namhyung
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ