[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20150419093112.GA6139@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 19 Apr 2015 11:31:13 +0200
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: Rabin Vincent <rabin@....in>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ibm.com>
Subject: Re: qemu:arm test failure due to commit 8053871d0f7f (smp: Fix
smp_call_function_single_async() locking)
* Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org> wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 19, 2015 at 4:48 AM, Linus Torvalds
> <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org> wrote:
> >
> > Does that smaller patch work equally well?
>
> .. and here's a properly formatted email and patch.
>
> Linus
> kernel/smp.c | 4 +++-
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/kernel/smp.c b/kernel/smp.c
> index 2aaac2c47683..07854477c164 100644
> --- a/kernel/smp.c
> +++ b/kernel/smp.c
> @@ -159,8 +159,10 @@ static int generic_exec_single(int cpu, struct call_single_data *csd,
> }
>
>
> - if ((unsigned)cpu >= nr_cpu_ids || !cpu_online(cpu))
> + if ((unsigned)cpu >= nr_cpu_ids || !cpu_online(cpu)) {
> + csd_unlock(csd);
> return -ENXIO;
> + }
Acked-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
Btw., in this case we should probably also generate a WARN_ONCE()
warning?
I _think_ most such callers calling an SMP function call for offline
or out of range CPUs are at minimum racy.
Thanks,
Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists