linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/3 V7] workqueue: split apply_workqueue

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <553470B7.7040805@cn.fujitsu.com>
Date:	Mon, 20 Apr 2015 11:21:27 +0800
From:	Lai Jiangshan <laijs@...fujitsu.com>
To:	Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
CC:	<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux.com>,
	Kevin Hilman <khilman@...aro.org>,
	Mike Galbraith <bitbucket@...ine.de>,
	"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>,
	Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3 V7] workqueue: split apply_workqueue_attrs() into
 3 stages

On 04/17/2015 10:57 PM, Tejun Heo wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 07, 2015 at 07:26:35PM +0800, Lai Jiangshan wrote:
>> Current apply_workqueue_attrs() includes pwqs-allocation and pwqs-installation,
>> so when we batch multiple apply_workqueue_attrs()s as a transaction, we can't
>> ensure the transaction must succeed or fail as a complete unit.
> 
> Lai, can you please
> 
> * Break out threads when posting new version.
> 
> * List the changes since the last version?

My bad.

I thought you had only two comments which ware handled in v7.
It was considered (with my laziness) too less to be renarrated.

---

In [2/4 V6]: 
```quote from TJ:
And we're dropping online_cpus locking before applying the new pwq's.
Is that safe?
```

It was my fault, I didn't remember when I wrongly moved the code.
The patch had been tried my best keep functionality unchanged.
It is fixed in [1/3 V7].

----

The changes from [4/4 V6] to [3/3 V7]:
ctx->attrs (the original configured value) is not calculated until
it is saved into ctx->attrs, and a corresponding local-var is killed.

Could you please consider it as [0/3 V7] this time?

Thx
Lai.

> 
> Thanks.
> 

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/