lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Mon, 20 Apr 2015 10:01:12 -0500
From:	Alex Elder <elder@...aro.org>
To:	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
	Konstantin Khlebnikov <koct9i@...il.com>
CC:	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Stable <stable@...r.kernel.org>, Sage Weil <sage@...tank.com>,
	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3.10 31/34] kernel.h: define u8, s8, u32, etc. limits

On 04/20/2015 09:35 AM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 20, 2015 at 12:43:30PM +0300, Konstantin Khlebnikov wrote:
>> On Fri, Apr 17, 2015 at 4:29 PM, Greg Kroah-Hartman
>> <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org> wrote:
>>> 3.10-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
>>>
>>> ------------------
>>>
>>> From: Alex Elder <alex.elder@...aro.org>
>>>
>>> commit 89a0714106aac7309c7dfa0f004b39e1e89d2942 upstream.
>>>
>>> Create constants that define the maximum and minimum values
>>> representable by the kernel types u8, s8, u16, s16, and so on.
>>
>> Now compilation prints a lot of wanings about redefined macro inside
>> reiserfs and ceph.
>>
>> Please pick also:
>>
>> 2f874deba7476a1e579af9028baa2f9dfdefedd1
>> ("conditionally define U32_MAX")

You want these, in this order:

7771953 conditionally define U32_MAX
89a0714 kernel.h: define u8, s8, u32, etc. limits
04f9b74 remove extra definitions of U32_MAX

					-Alex

>
> There is no such git id as 2f874deba7476a1e579af9028baa2f9dfdefedd1
>
>> 04f9b74e4d96d349de12fdd4e6626af4a9f75e09
>> ("remove extra definitions of U32_MAX")
>>
>> without first second patch doesn't applies clearly
>
> Given I have no idea what your first patch is, it's a bit hard to apply
> it :(
>

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ