[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CA+55aFy7_RXZ-B=3kqtpkRTT8e1i0D9TC-FHDx5v+w1ija1=Tw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 20 Apr 2015 13:50:38 -0700
From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Chengyu Song <csong84@...ech.edu>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: Huang Ying <ying.huang@...el.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, LKP ML <lkp@...org>,
Mark Fasheh <mfasheh@...e.com>,
Joel Becker <jlbec@...lplan.org>
Subject: Re: [LKP] [ocfs2] e2ac55b6a8e: ocfs2_init:1612 ERROR: Unable to
create ocfs2 debugfs root
On Sun, Apr 19, 2015 at 8:45 PM, Chengyu Song <csong84@...ech.edu> wrote:
>
> As suggested in the patch, -19 (-ENODEV) happens when debugfs is not configured (see include/linux/debugfs.h). So if debugfs is necessary for the functionality, in Kconfig, we should either declare it as a dependency, or auto select it.
That makes no sense.
If it used to work before that patch, then this is a regression and
the patch needs to be reverted.
Yes, the old code apparently used to set "o2hb_debug_dir" to an error
pointer when debugfs was compiled out, but since debugfs was compiled
out, that error pointer was probably never actually *used*. So things
presumably worked.
Now, it hangs, according to Huang Ying. If so, that's clearly a
regression. That means that commit e2ac55b6a8e3 ("ocfs2: incorrect
check for debugfs returns") needs to be reverted or fixed.
Andrew?
Linus
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists