linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 0/4] cpufreq: use generic cpufreq drivers for Exynos5250 platform

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Mon, 20 Apr 2015 14:07:33 -0700
From:	Kevin Hilman <khilman@...nel.org>
To:	Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <b.zolnierkie@...sung.com>
Cc:	Thomas Abraham <thomas.ab@...sung.com>,
	Sylwester Nawrocki <s.nawrocki@...sung.com>,
	Mike Turquette <mturquette@...aro.org>,
	Kukjin Kim <kgene.kim@...sung.com>,
	Kukjin Kim <kgene@...nel.org>,
	Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>,
	Lukasz Majewski <l.majewski@...sung.com>,
	Heiko Stuebner <heiko@...ech.de>, linux-pm@...r.kernel.org,
	Tomasz Figa <tomasz.figa@...il.com>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Chanwoo Choi <cw00.choi@...sung.com>,
	linux-samsung-soc@...r.kernel.org,
	Javier Martinez Canillas <javier.martinez@...labora.co.uk>,
	linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/4] cpufreq: use generic cpufreq drivers for Exynos5250 platform

Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <b.zolnierkie@...sung.com> writes:

> Hi,
>
> This patch series removes the use of Exynos5250 specific support
> from exynos-cpufreq driver and enables the use of cpufreq-dt driver
> for this platform.  The exynos-cpufreq driver itself is also removed
> as it is no longer used/needed after Exynos5250 support removal.
>
> This patch series has been tested on Exynos5250 based Arndale board.
>
> Depends on:
> - next-20150330 branch of linux-next kernel tree
> - "[PATCH 0/6] cpufreq: use generic cpufreq drivers for Exynos4210
>   platform" [1]
> - "[PATCH 0/6] cpufreq: use generic cpufreq drivers for Exynos4x12
>   platform" [2]
> - "[PATCH] cpufreq: exynos: remove dead ->need_apll_change method" [3]

Any chance you could prepare a branch with all the dependencies for easy
testing?

Also, The previous version from Thomas was v12, and this one is neither
versioned nor has any reference to what may have changed since that
version.  Also, on v12, I had several comments[1] and wonder if they've
been addressed.

Kevin

[1] http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.power-management.general/53494/match=patch+v12+0+6+use+generic+cpufreq


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/