[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAJzqFtbK+m2hrUn6uydeuMr+hfrzTe3hkMP76xQU8niRY62qWQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 20 Apr 2015 14:16:15 -0700
From: Kevin Cernekee <cernekee@...gle.com>
To: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
Cc: Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>, dgreid@...omium.org,
Andrew Bresticker <abrestic@...omium.org>,
Olof Johansson <olofj@...omium.org>,
alsa-devel@...a-project.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] ASoC: tas571x: Add DT binding document
On Sat, Apr 18, 2015 at 4:16 AM, Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org> wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 15, 2015 at 02:42:19PM -0700, Kevin Cernekee wrote:
>
>> +- VDD-supply: regulator phandle for the AVDD/DVDD/HP_VDD supply
>
> This is clearly not correct - if there are three separate physical
> supplies there should be three separate regulators requested. They may
> all resolve to one physical regulator on the board you are working with
> but that might not be true on other boards.
In the "simplified diagram," TI shows a single AVDD/DVDD/HP_VDD supply:
http://www.ti.com/lit/ds/symlink/tas5717.pdf#2
Page 20 also suggests the use of a single 3.3V supply for AVDD/DVDD/HP_VDD.
But this combines a number of separate pins. On 5711 we have
dedicated pins for:
PVDD_A
PVDD_B
PVDD_C
PVDD_D
AVDD
DVDD
On 5717 we have dedicated pins for:
PVDD_AB
PVDD_CD
AVDD
DVDD
HPVDD
I didn't see anything in the datasheet suggesting it is OK to have
different voltages or power states on the various supply pins (other
than the special voltage on PVDD).
I can add as many regulator entries as appropriate. What do you recommend?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists