[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1429574206.4352.53.camel@freescale.com>
Date: Mon, 20 Apr 2015 18:56:46 -0500
From: Scott Wood <scottwood@...escale.com>
To: Liberman Igal-B31950 <Igal.Liberman@...escale.com>
CC: Kumar Gala <galak@...nel.crashing.org>,
"linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org" <linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org>,
"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Bucur Madalin-Cristian-B32716 <madalin.bucur@...escale.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC,1/8] soc/fman: Add FMan MURAM support
On Mon, 2015-04-20 at 03:58 -0500, Liberman Igal-B31950 wrote:
>
> Regards,
> Igal Liberman.
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Kumar Gala [mailto:galak@...nel.crashing.org]
> > Sent: Thursday, March 12, 2015 5:57 PM
> > To: Liberman Igal-B31950
> > Cc: linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org; netdev@...r.kernel.org; linux-
> > kernel@...r.kernel.org; Wood Scott-B07421
> > Subject: Re: [RFC,1/8] soc/fman: Add FMan MURAM support
> >
> >
> > On Mar 11, 2015, at 12:07 AM, Igal.Liberman <igal.liberman@...escale.com>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > From: Igal Liberman <Igal.Liberman@...escale.com>
> > >
> > > Add Frame Manager Multi-User RAM support.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Igal Liberman <Igal.Liberman@...escale.com>
> > > ---
> > > drivers/soc/fsl/fman/Kconfig | 1 +
> > > drivers/soc/fsl/fman/Makefile | 5 +-
> > > drivers/soc/fsl/fman/fm_muram.c | 174
> > +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > > drivers/soc/fsl/fman/inc/fm_muram_ext.h | 98 +++++++++++++++++
> > > 4 files changed, 276 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) create mode 100644
> > > drivers/soc/fsl/fman/fm_muram.c create mode 100644
> > > drivers/soc/fsl/fman/inc/fm_muram_ext.h
> > >
> >
> > use lib/genalloc instead of rheap
> >
>
> Hi Kumar,
> I looked into lib/genalloc allocator.
> As far as I see, the genalloc allocator doesn't allow to control the memory alignment when you allocate a chunk of memory.
> Two important notes regarding MURAM memory:
> - The allocated memory chunks should have specific alignment (might be different in each chunk).
> - The allocations must be efficient, we don't want to "waste" MURAM due to alignment issues.
If the requirement is that allocations must be size-aligned, use
gen_pool_first_fit_order_align. Otherwise, improve genalloc to do what
you need.
-Scott
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists