[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20150421072610.GB22291@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 21 Apr 2015 09:26:10 +0200
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
To: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>
Cc: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
David Ahern <dsahern@...il.com>,
Taeung Song <treeze.taeung@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] perf tools: Document --children option in more detail
* Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org> wrote:
> Hi Ingo,
>
> On Mon, Apr 20, 2015 at 08:04:11PM +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> >
> > * Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org> wrote:
> >
> > > As the --children option changes the output of perf report (and perf
> > > top) it sometimes confuses users. Add more words and examples to help
> > > understanding of the option's behavior - and how to disable it ;-).
> >
> > Nice! :-)
>
> Thanks! :)
>
> >
> > > +++ b/tools/perf/Documentation/overhead.txt
> >
> > As some people might stumble upon this the old fashioned way, by
> > looking around in 'Documentation/', I'm wondering how this file name
> > will tell the reader that this is about call chains? (which isn't the
> > default recording mode) Maybe name it more explicitly, like
> > callchain-overhead.txt?
>
> OK. But I'd rather name it 'overhead-calculation.txt' to align with
> the section name. And 'callchain-overhead' makes me thinking about
> the overhead of processing callchains at record or report time.
Sure!
> > s/perfconfig/.perfconfig
> >
> > ?
>
> It seems we can have a system-wide /etc/perfconfig too. How about
> 'the perf config file' instead?
Yeah.
Thanks,
Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists