[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1429606465-10271-1-git-send-email-jolsa@kernel.org>
Date: Tue, 21 Apr 2015 10:54:25 +0200
From: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...nel.org>
To: lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Cc: Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
Stephane Eranian <eranian@...gle.com>
Subject: [PATCH] perf/x86/intel: Add cpu_(prepare|starting|dying) for core_pmu
The core_pmu does not define cpu_* callbacks, which handles
allocation of 'struct cpu_hw_events::shared_regs' data,
initialization of debug store and PMU_FL_EXCL_CNTRS counters.
While this probably won't happen on bare metal, virtual CPU can
define x86_pmu.extra_regs together with PMU version 1 and thus
be using core_pmu -> using shared_regs data without it being
allocated. That could could leave to following panic:
BUG: unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at (null)
IP: [<ffffffff8152cd4f>] _spin_lock_irqsave+0x1f/0x40
SNIP
[<ffffffff81024bd9>] __intel_shared_reg_get_constraints+0x69/0x1e0
[<ffffffff81024deb>] intel_get_event_constraints+0x9b/0x180
[<ffffffff8101e815>] x86_schedule_events+0x75/0x1d0
[<ffffffff810586dc>] ? check_preempt_curr+0x7c/0x90
[<ffffffff810649fe>] ? try_to_wake_up+0x24e/0x3e0
[<ffffffff81064ba2>] ? default_wake_function+0x12/0x20
[<ffffffff8109eb16>] ? autoremove_wake_function+0x16/0x40
[<ffffffff810577e9>] ? __wake_up_common+0x59/0x90
[<ffffffff811a9517>] ? __d_lookup+0xa7/0x150
[<ffffffff8119db5f>] ? do_lookup+0x9f/0x230
[<ffffffff811a993a>] ? dput+0x9a/0x150
[<ffffffff8119c8f5>] ? path_to_nameidata+0x25/0x60
[<ffffffff8119e90a>] ? __link_path_walk+0x7da/0x1000
[<ffffffff8101d8f9>] ? x86_pmu_add+0xb9/0x170
[<ffffffff8101d7a7>] x86_pmu_commit_txn+0x67/0xc0
[<ffffffff811b07b0>] ? mntput_no_expire+0x30/0x110
[<ffffffff8119c731>] ? path_put+0x31/0x40
[<ffffffff8107c297>] ? current_fs_time+0x27/0x30
[<ffffffff8117d170>] ? mem_cgroup_get_reclaim_stat_from_page+0x20/0x70
[<ffffffff8111b7aa>] group_sched_in+0x13a/0x170
[<ffffffff81014a29>] ? sched_clock+0x9/0x10
[<ffffffff8111bac8>] ctx_sched_in+0x2e8/0x330
[<ffffffff8111bb7b>] perf_event_sched_in+0x6b/0xb0
[<ffffffff8111bc36>] perf_event_context_sched_in+0x76/0xc0
[<ffffffff8111eb3b>] perf_event_comm+0x1bb/0x2e0
[<ffffffff81195ee9>] set_task_comm+0x69/0x80
[<ffffffff81195fe1>] setup_new_exec+0xe1/0x2e0
[<ffffffff811ea68e>] load_elf_binary+0x3ce/0x1ab0
Adding cpu_(prepare|starting|dying) for core_pmu to have shared_regs
data allocated for core_pmu. AFAICS there's no harm to initialize
debug store and PMU_FL_EXCL_CNTRS either for core_pmu.
Signed-off-by: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...nel.org>
---
arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel.c | 7 +++++++
1 file changed, 7 insertions(+)
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel.c
index 9da2400c2ec3..0a61a9a021de 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel.c
@@ -2533,6 +2533,10 @@ ssize_t intel_event_sysfs_show(char *page, u64 config)
return x86_event_sysfs_show(page, config, event);
}
+static int intel_pmu_cpu_prepare(int cpu);
+static void intel_pmu_cpu_starting(int cpu);
+static void intel_pmu_cpu_dying(int cpu);
+
static __initconst const struct x86_pmu core_pmu = {
.name = "core",
.handle_irq = x86_pmu_handle_irq,
@@ -2559,6 +2563,9 @@ static __initconst const struct x86_pmu core_pmu = {
.guest_get_msrs = core_guest_get_msrs,
.format_attrs = intel_arch_formats_attr,
.events_sysfs_show = intel_event_sysfs_show,
+ .cpu_prepare = intel_pmu_cpu_prepare,
+ .cpu_starting = intel_pmu_cpu_starting,
+ .cpu_dying = intel_pmu_cpu_dying,
};
struct intel_shared_regs *allocate_shared_regs(int cpu)
--
1.9.3
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists