[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20150421105123.GB5579@kroah.com>
Date: Tue, 21 Apr 2015 12:51:23 +0200
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: One Thousand Gnomes <gnomes@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>
Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net>,
Richard Weinberger <richard@....at>,
David Herrmann <dh.herrmann@...il.com>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Jiri Kosina <jkosina@...e.cz>,
Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>,
Tom Gundersen <teg@...m.no>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Daniel Mack <daniel@...que.org>,
Djalal Harouni <tixxdz@...ndz.org>
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] kdbus for 4.1-rc1
On Tue, Apr 21, 2015 at 10:35:19AM +0100, One Thousand Gnomes wrote:
>
> We do need something for the multicast messaging. Whether that's
> supporting AF_LOCAL, SOCK_RDP with multicast or something else (POSIX
> message queue extensions ?). There's no real IP layer reliable ordered
> multicast delivery system that is low latency and lightweight because
> once it hits real networks it changes from a hard problem into a
> seriously hard problem because of multicast implosions and the like.
This was attempted in the past with AF_DBUS, but the networking
maintainers rightfully pointed out that the model there did not work.
thanks,
greg k-h
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists