[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <55364BB0.6060108@arm.com>
Date: Tue, 21 Apr 2015 14:08:00 +0100
From: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@....com>
To: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Daniel Thompson <daniel.thompson@...aro.org>
CC: linaro-kernel@...ts.linaro.org,
Russell King <linux@....linux.org.uk>,
Jason Cooper <jason@...edaemon.net>, patches@...aro.org,
Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...eaurora.org>,
Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Daniel Drake <drake@...lessm.com>,
Dmitry Pervushin <dpervushin@...il.com>,
Dirk Behme <dirk.behme@...bosch.com>,
John Stultz <john.stultz@...aro.org>,
Tim Sander <tim@...eglstein.org>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
Sumit Semwal <sumit.semwal@...aro.org>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [RESEND PATCH 4.0-rc7 v20 0/6] irq/arm: Implement arch_trigger_all_cpu_backtrace
On 21/04/15 13:46, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> On Fri, 10 Apr 2015, Daniel Thompson wrote:
>
>> Jason/Thomas:
>> Any chance of taking the first five of these patches via the irqchip
>> route? The x86 patch has an ack from Ingo, printk has no explicit
>> maintainer and I've done plenty of bisectability tests on the patchset
>> so leaving the last patch for the next dev. cycle should be no
>> trouble.
>
> First of all I need an acked/reviewed from Marc or Russell,
> preferrably both of them.
I'm on it.
Thanks,
M.
--
Jazz is not dead. It just smells funny...
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists