linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] x86: Reset FPU on exec

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.11.1504211615340.13914@nanos>
Date:	Tue, 21 Apr 2015 16:23:56 +0200 (CEST)
From:	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
To:	Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>
cc:	Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>, x86@...nel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86: Reset FPU on exec

Andi,

On Tue, 21 Apr 2015, Andi Kleen wrote:
> > What's the exact purpose of this patch aside of breaking the build?
> 
> Try reading the description?

I'll try to decrypt that once I have a functional patch.

> Also it builds fine here.

I don't care whether it builds for you on your random tree. I care
whether it compiles against the relevant reference trees (tip/linus).

And it CANNOT compile against them at all. Simply because
drop_init_fpu() does not exist.

You are just out there to waste maintainer time and annoy everyone
who has the displeasure to handle your sloppy patches and deal with
your obnoxious unwillingness to cooperate, aren't you?

Thanks,

	tglx

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/