linux-kernel - RE: [PATCH Bugfix 1/4] x86/xsave.c: Fix xstate offsets and sizes enumeration

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.11.1504211627300.13914@nanos>
Date:	Tue, 21 Apr 2015 16:28:44 +0200 (CEST)
From:	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
To:	"Yu, Fenghua" <fenghua.yu@...el.com>
cc:	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...ux.intel.com>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
	"Mallick, Asit K" <asit.k.mallick@...el.com>,
	"Hansen, Dave" <dave.hansen@...el.com>,
	"Williamson, Glenn P" <glenn.p.williamson@...el.com>,
	linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, x86 <x86@...nel.org>
Subject: RE: [PATCH Bugfix 1/4] x86/xsave.c: Fix xstate offsets and sizes
 enumeration

On Tue, 21 Apr 2015, Yu, Fenghua wrote:
> > This is a regular hardware enablement or are you saying that this is backport
> > material?
> 
> I would like the patch to be backported to distros or stable kernel because
> we may really see the issue in near future if it's not backported.

Then you should clearly explain that in a 0/N cover mail which
describes the scope and impact of the patch series. That way more
useful than a screaming BUGFIX prefix.

Thanks,

	tglx
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/