linux-kernel - [PATCH 3.16.y-ckt 103/144] ARC: SA_SIGINFO ucontext regs off-by-one

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <1429630329-21748-104-git-send-email-luis.henriques@canonical.com>
Date:	Tue, 21 Apr 2015 16:31:28 +0100
From:	Luis Henriques <luis.henriques@...onical.com>
To:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...r.kernel.org,
	kernel-team@...ts.ubuntu.com
Cc:	Vineet Gupta <vgupta@...opsys.com>,
	Luis Henriques <luis.henriques@...onical.com>
Subject: [PATCH 3.16.y-ckt 103/144] ARC: SA_SIGINFO ucontext regs off-by-one

3.16.7-ckt10 -stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: Vineet Gupta <vgupta@...opsys.com>

commit 6914e1e3f63caa829431160f0f7093292daef2d5 upstream.

The regfile provided to SA_SIGINFO signal handler as ucontext was off by
one due to pt_regs gutter cleanups in 2013.

Before handling signal, user pt_regs are copied onto user_regs_struct and copied
back later. Both structs are binary compatible. This was all fine until
commit 2fa919045b72 (ARC: pt_regs update #2) which removed the empty stack slot
at top of pt_regs (corresponding to first pad) and made the corresponding
fixup in struct user_regs_struct (the pad in there was moved out of
@scratch - not removed altogether as it is part of ptrace ABI)

 struct user_regs_struct {
+       long pad;
        struct {
-               long pad;
                long bta, lp_start, lp_end,....
        } scratch;
 ...
 }

This meant that now user_regs_struct was off by 1 reg w.r.t pt_regs and
signal code needs to user_regs_struct.scratch to reflect it as pt_regs,
which is what this commit does.

This problem was hidden for 2 years, because both save/restore, despite
using wrong location, were using the same location. Only an interim
inspection (reproducer below) exposed the issue.

     void handle_segv(int signo, siginfo_t *info, void *context)
     {
 	ucontext_t *uc = context;
	struct user_regs_struct *regs = &(uc->uc_mcontext.regs);

	printf("regs %x %x\n",               <=== prints 7 8 (vs. 8 9)
               regs->scratch.r8, regs->scratch.r9);
     }

     int main()
     {
	struct sigaction sa;

	sa.sa_sigaction = handle_segv;
	sa.sa_flags = SA_SIGINFO;
	sigemptyset(&sa.sa_mask);
	sigaction(SIGSEGV, &sa, NULL);

	asm volatile(
	"mov	r7, 7	\n"
	"mov	r8, 8	\n"
	"mov	r9, 9	\n"
	"mov	r10, 10	\n"
	:::"r7","r8","r9","r10");

	*((unsigned int*)0x10) = 0;
     }

Fixes: 2fa919045b72ec892e "ARC: pt_regs update #2: Remove unused gutter at start of pt_regs"
Signed-off-by: Vineet Gupta <vgupta@...opsys.com>
Signed-off-by: Luis Henriques <luis.henriques@...onical.com>
---
 arch/arc/kernel/signal.c | 4 ++--
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/arc/kernel/signal.c b/arch/arc/kernel/signal.c
index 7e95e1a86510..d68b410595c8 100644
--- a/arch/arc/kernel/signal.c
+++ b/arch/arc/kernel/signal.c
@@ -67,7 +67,7 @@ stash_usr_regs(struct rt_sigframe __user *sf, struct pt_regs *regs,
 	       sigset_t *set)
 {
 	int err;
-	err = __copy_to_user(&(sf->uc.uc_mcontext.regs), regs,
+	err = __copy_to_user(&(sf->uc.uc_mcontext.regs.scratch), regs,
 			     sizeof(sf->uc.uc_mcontext.regs.scratch));
 	err |= __copy_to_user(&sf->uc.uc_sigmask, set, sizeof(sigset_t));
 
@@ -83,7 +83,7 @@ static int restore_usr_regs(struct pt_regs *regs, struct rt_sigframe __user *sf)
 	if (!err)
 		set_current_blocked(&set);
 
-	err |= __copy_from_user(regs, &(sf->uc.uc_mcontext.regs),
+	err |= __copy_from_user(regs, &(sf->uc.uc_mcontext.regs.scratch),
 				sizeof(sf->uc.uc_mcontext.regs.scratch));
 
 	return err;
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/