linux-kernel - [PATCH 3.16.y-ckt 141/144] sb_edac: Fix erroneous bytes->gigabytes conversion

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1429630329-21748-142-git-send-email-luis.henriques@canonical.com>
Date:	Tue, 21 Apr 2015 16:32:06 +0100
From:	Luis Henriques <luis.henriques@...onical.com>
To:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...r.kernel.org,
	kernel-team@...ts.ubuntu.com
Cc:	Jim Snow <jim.snow@...el.com>,
	Lukasz Anaczkowski <lukasz.anaczkowski@...el.com>,
	Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@....samsung.com>,
	Vinson Lee <vlee@...pensource.com>,
	Luis Henriques <luis.henriques@...onical.com>
Subject: [PATCH 3.16.y-ckt 141/144] sb_edac: Fix erroneous bytes->gigabytes conversion

3.16.7-ckt10 -stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: Jim Snow <jim.m.snow@...el.com>

commit 8c009100295597f23978c224aec5751a365bc965 upstream.

Signed-off-by: Jim Snow <jim.snow@...el.com>
Signed-off-by: Lukasz Anaczkowski <lukasz.anaczkowski@...el.com>
Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@....samsung.com>
Cc: Vinson Lee <vlee@...pensource.com>
[ luis: backported to 3.16: adjusted context ]
Signed-off-by: Luis Henriques <luis.henriques@...onical.com>
---
 drivers/edac/sb_edac.c | 38 ++++++++++++++++++++------------------
 1 file changed, 20 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/edac/sb_edac.c b/drivers/edac/sb_edac.c
index deea0dc9999b..aa174f3a9e45 100644
--- a/drivers/edac/sb_edac.c
+++ b/drivers/edac/sb_edac.c
@@ -764,7 +764,7 @@ static void get_memory_layout(const struct mem_ctl_info *mci)
 	u32 reg;
 	u64 limit, prv = 0;
 	u64 tmp_mb;
-	u32 mb, kb;
+	u32 gb, mb;
 	u32 rir_way;
 
 	/*
@@ -774,15 +774,17 @@ static void get_memory_layout(const struct mem_ctl_info *mci)
 	pvt->tolm = pvt->info.get_tolm(pvt);
 	tmp_mb = (1 + pvt->tolm) >> 20;
 
-	mb = div_u64_rem(tmp_mb, 1000, &kb);
-	edac_dbg(0, "TOLM: %u.%03u GB (0x%016Lx)\n", mb, kb, (u64)pvt->tolm);
+	gb = div_u64_rem(tmp_mb, 1024, &mb);
+	edac_dbg(0, "TOLM: %u.%03u GB (0x%016Lx)\n",
+		gb, (mb*1000)/1024, (u64)pvt->tolm);
 
 	/* Address range is already 45:25 */
 	pvt->tohm = pvt->info.get_tohm(pvt);
 	tmp_mb = (1 + pvt->tohm) >> 20;
 
-	mb = div_u64_rem(tmp_mb, 1000, &kb);
-	edac_dbg(0, "TOHM: %u.%03u GB (0x%016Lx)\n", mb, kb, (u64)pvt->tohm);
+	gb = div_u64_rem(tmp_mb, 1024, &mb);
+	edac_dbg(0, "TOHM: %u.%03u GB (0x%016Lx)\n",
+		gb, (mb*1000)/1024, (u64)pvt->tohm);
 
 	/*
 	 * Step 2) Get SAD range and SAD Interleave list
@@ -804,11 +806,11 @@ static void get_memory_layout(const struct mem_ctl_info *mci)
 			break;
 
 		tmp_mb = (limit + 1) >> 20;
-		mb = div_u64_rem(tmp_mb, 1000, &kb);
+		gb = div_u64_rem(tmp_mb, 1024, &mb);
 		edac_dbg(0, "SAD#%d %s up to %u.%03u GB (0x%016Lx) Interleave: %s reg=0x%08x\n",
 			 n_sads,
 			 get_dram_attr(reg),
-			 mb, kb,
+			 gb, (mb*1000)/1024,
 			 ((u64)tmp_mb) << 20L,
 			 INTERLEAVE_MODE(reg) ? "8:6" : "[8:6]XOR[18:16]",
 			 reg);
@@ -839,9 +841,9 @@ static void get_memory_layout(const struct mem_ctl_info *mci)
 			break;
 		tmp_mb = (limit + 1) >> 20;
 
-		mb = div_u64_rem(tmp_mb, 1000, &kb);
+		gb = div_u64_rem(tmp_mb, 1024, &mb);
 		edac_dbg(0, "TAD#%d: up to %u.%03u GB (0x%016Lx), socket interleave %d, memory interleave %d, TGT: %d, %d, %d, %d, reg=0x%08x\n",
-			 n_tads, mb, kb,
+			 n_tads, gb, (mb*1000)/1024,
 			 ((u64)tmp_mb) << 20L,
 			 (u32)TAD_SOCK(reg),
 			 (u32)TAD_CH(reg),
@@ -864,10 +866,10 @@ static void get_memory_layout(const struct mem_ctl_info *mci)
 					      tad_ch_nilv_offset[j],
 					      &reg);
 			tmp_mb = TAD_OFFSET(reg) >> 20;
-			mb = div_u64_rem(tmp_mb, 1000, &kb);
+			gb = div_u64_rem(tmp_mb, 1024, &mb);
 			edac_dbg(0, "TAD CH#%d, offset #%d: %u.%03u GB (0x%016Lx), reg=0x%08x\n",
 				 i, j,
-				 mb, kb,
+				 gb, (mb*1000)/1024,
 				 ((u64)tmp_mb) << 20L,
 				 reg);
 		}
@@ -889,10 +891,10 @@ static void get_memory_layout(const struct mem_ctl_info *mci)
 
 			tmp_mb = RIR_LIMIT(reg) >> 20;
 			rir_way = 1 << RIR_WAY(reg);
-			mb = div_u64_rem(tmp_mb, 1000, &kb);
+			gb = div_u64_rem(tmp_mb, 1024, &mb);
 			edac_dbg(0, "CH#%d RIR#%d, limit: %u.%03u GB (0x%016Lx), way: %d, reg=0x%08x\n",
 				 i, j,
-				 mb, kb,
+				 gb, (mb*1000)/1024,
 				 ((u64)tmp_mb) << 20L,
 				 rir_way,
 				 reg);
@@ -903,10 +905,10 @@ static void get_memory_layout(const struct mem_ctl_info *mci)
 						      &reg);
 				tmp_mb = RIR_OFFSET(reg) << 6;
 
-				mb = div_u64_rem(tmp_mb, 1000, &kb);
+				gb = div_u64_rem(tmp_mb, 1024, &mb);
 				edac_dbg(0, "CH#%d RIR#%d INTL#%d, offset %u.%03u GB (0x%016Lx), tgt: %d, reg=0x%08x\n",
 					 i, j, k,
-					 mb, kb,
+					 gb, (mb*1000)/1024,
 					 ((u64)tmp_mb) << 20L,
 					 (u32)RIR_RNK_TGT(reg),
 					 reg);
@@ -944,7 +946,7 @@ static int get_memory_error_data(struct mem_ctl_info *mci,
 	u8			ch_way, sck_way, pkg, sad_ha = 0;
 	u32			tad_offset;
 	u32			rir_way;
-	u32			mb, kb;
+	u32			mb, gb;
 	u64			ch_addr, offset, limit = 0, prv = 0;
 
 
@@ -1182,10 +1184,10 @@ static int get_memory_error_data(struct mem_ctl_info *mci,
 			continue;
 
 		limit = RIR_LIMIT(reg);
-		mb = div_u64_rem(limit >> 20, 1000, &kb);
+		gb = div_u64_rem(limit >> 20, 1024, &mb);
 		edac_dbg(0, "RIR#%d, limit: %u.%03u GB (0x%016Lx), way: %d\n",
 			 n_rir,
-			 mb, kb,
+			 gb, (mb*1000)/1024,
 			 limit,
 			 1 << RIR_WAY(reg));
 		if  (ch_addr <= limit)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/