| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <20150421155413.GG5561@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Date: Tue, 21 Apr 2015 08:54:13 -0700 From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com> To: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org> Cc: Clark Williams <williams@...hat.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl, akpm@...ux-foundation.org, linux-rt-users@...r.kernel.org Subject: Re: [GIT RFC PULL rcu/urgent] Prevent Kconfig from asking pointless questions On Tue, Apr 21, 2015 at 11:50:27AM -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote: > On Tue, 21 Apr 2015 08:01:22 -0700 > "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote: > > > > > Seem reasonable? > > > > > > Does chrt override the kthread_prio at run time? If so, then great. > > > Otherwise, the sysadmin should still have a way to control their > > > priorities of kernel threads (with few exceptions like the migration > > > thread). > > > > Yep, RCU sets the prios only at boot time, so if they are set differently > > at runtime, they should stay set differently. Unless chrt refuses to > > work on kthreads or something. ;-) > > Great! This all sounds reasonable to me :-) OK, will proceed as planned, then! Thanx, Paul -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists