linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 2/5] usb: xhci: plat: Create both HCDs before adding them

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <55361D42.8040101@ti.com>
Date:	Tue, 21 Apr 2015 12:49:54 +0300
From:	Roger Quadros <rogerq@...com>
To:	Mathias Nyman <mathias.nyman@...ux.intel.com>,
	<mathias.nyman@...el.com>,
	Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@...e-electrons.com>
CC:	<gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>, <linux-usb@...r.kernel.org>,
	<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, "Balbi, Felipe" <balbi@...com>,
	<kishon@...comg>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/5] usb: xhci: plat: Create both HCDs before adding them

On 20/04/15 15:35, Mathias Nyman wrote:
> Hi
> 
> On 02.04.2015 15:23, Roger Quadros wrote:
>> As xhci_hcd is now allocated by usb_create_hcd(), we don't
>> need to add the primary HCD before creating the shared HCD.
>>
>> Creating the shared HCD before adding the primary HCD is particularly
>> useful for the OTG use case so that we know at the OTG core if
>> the HCD is in single configuration or dual (primary + shared)
>> configuration.
>>
> 
> This doesn't apply as 
> 
> commit 7b8ef22ea547b80475ac7feab06fb15e0fc143d8
>     usb: xhci: plat: Add USB phy support
> 
> changed xhci-plat.c since.
> 
> I rebased it, and the changed version is sitting in the for-usb-next branch in:
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/mnyman/xhci.git
> 
> But it appeared to me that usb_add_hcd() and usb_remove_hcd() will also
> call phy init and remove functions. As the order how hcds are created and added
> would change I'd need some more eyes on this to see if it will cause regression.
> 
> Or maybe in the best case we could get rid of the "Add USB phy support" patch as
> we will call xhci_add_hcd() for the first hcd much later, and it could maybe init
> the phy for us?

I thought usb_phy_*() stuff would be deprecated and we should use phy framework
instead i.e. phy_init() and friends.

In fact usb_add_hcd() is already handling the phy for us.
So I'm in favor of getting rid of commit 7b8ef22ea547b80475ac7feab06fb15e0fc143d8
(usb: xhci: plat: Add USB phy support)

cheers,
-roger
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/