linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH RFC] x86: enforce inlining for atomics

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAPh34memztvm3mF+o+QO-ocu9NG7o_z-Uf+0VtVneet0CJoB9A@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Wed, 22 Apr 2015 11:31:28 +0200
From:	Hagen Paul Pfeifer <hagen@...u.net>
To:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
Cc:	Markus Trippelsdorf <markus@...ppelsdorf.de>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC] x86: enforce inlining for atomics

On 22 April 2015 at 11:28, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org> wrote:

> So I think the original patch makes sense (and I already applied it),
> we want known-simple and performance critical methods (such as atomic
> ops) always inlined.

Right. As I wrote I will post a follow up patch for the remaining
cases where inline is a must. To guarantee that performance critical
functions are always inlined - no matter what configuration is used.

Thank you!

Hagen
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/