linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] KVM: x86: tweak types of fields in kvm_lapic

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Wed, 22 Apr 2015 12:27:55 +0200
From:	Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>
To:	Radim Krčmář <rkrcmar@...hat.com>
CC:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kvm@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] KVM: x86: tweak types of fields in kvm_lapic_irq



On 22/04/2015 11:35, Radim Krčmář wrote:
> > Change the level field to bool, since we assign 1 sometimes, but
> > just mask icr_low with APIC_INT_ASSERT in apic_send_-ipi.
> 
> Would be more consistent to change that assignment instead ...
> If we dropped the idea that struct kvm_lapic_irq fields can be bitORed
> to get the ICR, we could also easily change trig_mode/dest_mode to bool
> level_trig/logical_dest.  (I can do a followup patch.)

Right, I thought of both.  However, level is something that has an
obviously understandable meaning as a bool, while trig_mode/dest_mode as
you said have to be renamed as well.

You're right on the u8 type for vector, too.  But I probably will end up
not committing this patch at all...

Paolo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/