lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1F3AC3675D538145B1661F571FE1805F19A5B355@irsmsx105.ger.corp.intel.com>
Date:	Wed, 22 Apr 2015 11:33:46 +0000
From:	"Tirdea, Irina" <irina.tirdea@...el.com>
To:	'Jonathan Cameron' <jic23@...nel.org>,
	"linux-iio@...r.kernel.org" <linux-iio@...r.kernel.org>,
	"devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>
CC:	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	"Hartmut Knaack" <knaack.h@....de>,
	Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@...afoo.de>,
	"Peter Meerwald" <pmeerw@...erw.net>,
	Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
	Pawel Moll <pawel.moll@....com>,
	Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
	Ian Campbell <ijc+devicetree@...lion.org.uk>,
	Kumar Gala <galak@...eaurora.org>
Subject: RE: [PATCH 1/3] iio: core: Introduce IIO_CHAN_INFO_CALIBREPETITIONS



> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jonathan Cameron [mailto:jic23@...nel.org]
> Sent: 18 April, 2015 19:47
> To: Tirdea, Irina; linux-iio@...r.kernel.org; devicetree@...r.kernel.org
> Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org; Hartmut Knaack; Lars-Peter Clausen; Peter Meerwald; Rob Herring; Pawel Moll; Mark Rutland; Ian
> Campbell; Kumar Gala
> Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] iio: core: Introduce IIO_CHAN_INFO_CALIBREPETITIONS
> 
> On 17/04/15 11:50, Irina Tirdea wrote:
> > Some magnetometers can perform a number of repetitions in HW
> > for each measurement to increase accuracy. One example is
> > Bosch BMC150:
> > http://ae-bst.resource.bosch.com/media/products/dokumente/bmc150/BST-BMC150-DS000-04.pdf.
> >
> > Introduce an interface to set the number of repetitions
> > for these devices.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Irina Tirdea <irina.tirdea@...el.com>
> > ---
> >  Documentation/ABI/testing/sysfs-bus-iio | 10 ++++++++++
> >  drivers/iio/industrialio-core.c         |  1 +
> >  include/linux/iio/iio.h                 |  1 +
> >  3 files changed, 12 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/Documentation/ABI/testing/sysfs-bus-iio b/Documentation/ABI/testing/sysfs-bus-iio
> > index 866b4ec..74c1444 100644
> > --- a/Documentation/ABI/testing/sysfs-bus-iio
> > +++ b/Documentation/ABI/testing/sysfs-bus-iio
> > @@ -1375,3 +1375,13 @@ Description:
> >  		The emissivity ratio of the surface in the field of view of the
> >  		contactless temperature sensor.  Emissivity varies from 0 to 1,
> >  		with 1 being the emissivity of a black body.
> > +
> > +What:		/sys/bus/iio/devices/iio:deviceX/in_magn_x_calibrepetitions
> > +What:		/sys/bus/iio/devices/iio:deviceX/in_magn_y_calibrepetitions
> > +What:		/sys/bus/iio/devices/iio:deviceX/in_magn_z_calibrepetitions
> > +KernelVersion:	4.2
> > +Contact:	linux-iio@...r.kernel.org
> > +Description:
> > +		Hardware applied number of repetitions for acquiring one
> > +		data point. The HW will do <type>[_name]_calibrepetitions
> > +		measurements and return the average value as output data.
> This is an interesting way of naming what is often referred to as oversampling.
> I'd like to get some other opinions on naming before we go with the ABI for this..
> 
> We do have one driver in staging exporting oversampling_ratio which is probably
> the same thing, but that ABI was never standardized so I have no problem with
> ignoring that one case.  A couple of other drivers provide oversampling control
> via platform data.   We must make sure we give a sensible default for this.
> 
I didn't know about the oversampling_ratio. I used "repetitions" because Bosch calls them so
in the datasheet.
However, I think oversampling_ratio is a better name since it suggests a
connection with sampling. I will change it to oversampling_ratio in v2 and then
wait for more opinions on this.

> There is also the interesting question of whether sampling_frequency applies
> before or after this...  I'd argue after, but again would like more opinions
> before we dictate that.  However, whatever we choose should definitely be
> documented here!
> 
The HW sees the sampling_frequency as the frequency the user sees, so it does not take into
account the oversampling_ratio: each value resulted after oversampling_ratio repetitions is
considered one sample for the sampling_frequency. However, I am not sure how other
devices handle this so more opinions on this would be useful.

Looking more into the oversampling ratio from BMC150, seems there are some
sampling limitations I missed the first time: when setting a certain value for x/y/z repetitions,
not all sampling rates are available.  I am going to fix this in v2 by not allowing invalid
sampling rates once a certain value for oversampling_ratio is set.

Thanks,
Irina

> > diff --git a/drivers/iio/industrialio-core.c b/drivers/iio/industrialio-core.c
> > index 7c98bc1..9e0da7f 100644
> > --- a/drivers/iio/industrialio-core.c
> > +++ b/drivers/iio/industrialio-core.c
> > @@ -129,6 +129,7 @@ static const char * const iio_chan_info_postfix[] = {
> >  	[IIO_CHAN_INFO_DEBOUNCE_COUNT] = "debounce_count",
> >  	[IIO_CHAN_INFO_DEBOUNCE_TIME] = "debounce_time",
> >  	[IIO_CHAN_INFO_CALIBEMISSIVITY] = "calibemissivity",
> > +	[IIO_CHAN_INFO_CALIBREPETITIONS] = "calibrepetitions",
> >  };
> >
> >  /**
> > diff --git a/include/linux/iio/iio.h b/include/linux/iio/iio.h
> > index b1e46ae..07fbfb2 100644
> > --- a/include/linux/iio/iio.h
> > +++ b/include/linux/iio/iio.h
> > @@ -44,6 +44,7 @@ enum iio_chan_info_enum {
> >  	IIO_CHAN_INFO_DEBOUNCE_COUNT,
> >  	IIO_CHAN_INFO_DEBOUNCE_TIME,
> >  	IIO_CHAN_INFO_CALIBEMISSIVITY,
> > +	IIO_CHAN_INFO_CALIBREPETITIONS,
> >  };
> >
> >  enum iio_shared_by {
> >

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ