[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1429664686.27410.84.camel@kernel.crashing.org>
Date: Wed, 22 Apr 2015 11:04:46 +1000
From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>
To: paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com
Cc: Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-mm@...ck.org, jglisse@...hat.com, mgorman@...e.de,
aarcange@...hat.com, riel@...hat.com, airlied@...hat.com,
aneesh.kumar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com,
Cameron Buschardt <cabuschardt@...dia.com>,
Mark Hairgrove <mhairgrove@...dia.com>,
Geoffrey Gerfin <ggerfin@...dia.com>,
John McKenna <jmckenna@...dia.com>, akpm@...ux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: Interacting with coherent memory on external devices
On Tue, 2015-04-21 at 17:57 -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 22, 2015 at 10:42:52AM +1000, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
> > On Tue, 2015-04-21 at 18:49 -0500, Christoph Lameter wrote:
> > > On Tue, 21 Apr 2015, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> > >
> > > > Thoughts?
> > >
> > > Use DAX for memory instead of the other approaches? That way it is
> > > explicitly clear what information is put on the CAPI device.
> >
> > Care to elaborate on what DAX is ?
>
> I would like to know as well. My first attempt to Google got me nothing
> but Star Trek. Is DAX the persistent-memory topic covered here?
>
> https://lwn.net/Articles/591779/
> https://lwn.net/Articles/610174/
>
> Ben will correct me if I am wrong, but I do not believe that we are
> looking for persistent memory in this case.
Right, it doesn't look at all like what we want.
Ben.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists