linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 2/3] libata: Add firmware

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20150422144812.GA10592@htj.duckdns.org>
Date:	Wed, 22 Apr 2015 10:48:12 -0400
From:	Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
To:	Matthew Garrett <mjg59@...eos.com>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-ide@...r.kernel.org,
	kristen@...ux.intel.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] libata: Add firmware_default LPM policy

Hello, Matthew.

On Sat, Apr 18, 2015 at 08:26:35AM -0700, Matthew Garrett wrote:
> +firmware_defaults	Inherit configuration from the state programmed by
> +			the firmware during system init.

Do we lose anything by naming the policy just "firmware"?

> @@ -701,9 +702,9 @@ static int ahci_set_lpm(struct ata_link *link, enum ata_lpm_policy policy,
>  
>  	if (hpriv->cap & HOST_CAP_ALPM) {
>  		u32 cmd = readl(port_mmio + PORT_CMD);
> +		cmd &= ~(PORT_CMD_ASP | PORT_CMD_ALPE);

Prolly worth nothing in the changelog?

>  
>  		if (policy == ATA_LPM_MAX_POWER || !(hints & ATA_LPM_HIPM)) {
> -			cmd &= ~(PORT_CMD_ASP | PORT_CMD_ALPE);
>  			cmd |= PORT_CMD_ICC_ACTIVE;
>  
>  			writel(cmd, port_mmio + PORT_CMD);
...
> @@ -2024,7 +2024,7 @@ retry:
>  		}
>  	}
>  
> -	if (id[79] & SATA_DIPM)
> +	if (id[79] & (1 << SATA_DIPM))
>  		dev->init_dipm = true;

Does this chunk belong here?

Thanks.

-- 
tejun
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/