linux-kernel - Re: [RFC PATCH] rcu: config: Remove prompt for RCU implementation

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20150422011821.GR5561@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Date:	Tue, 21 Apr 2015 18:18:21 -0700
From:	"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To:	Pranith Kumar <bobby.prani@...il.com>
Cc:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.cz>,
	Josh Triplett <josh@...htriplett.org>,
	Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>,
	Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>,
	Bertrand Jacquin <beber@...eeweb.net>,
	"Luis R. Rodriguez" <mcgrof@...e.com>,
	Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net>,
	Clark Williams <clark.williams@...il.com>,
	open list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] rcu: config: Remove prompt for RCU implementation

On Tue, Apr 21, 2015 at 05:29:42PM -0400, Pranith Kumar wrote:
> The RCU implementation which is chosen is dependent on PREEMPT and SMP config
> options and is not really a user-selectable choice. The following change will
> remove the menu entry and will be derived from the above two options.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Pranith Kumar <bobby.prani@...il.com>

Hmmm...  I guess that there isn't much point in calling something a
"choice" when it hasn't really been a choice for quite a few years
now.  I queued this, and have started testing it.

							Thanx, Paul

> ---
>  init/Kconfig | 18 ++++++------------
>  1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/init/Kconfig b/init/Kconfig
> index 0b37750..7707e4a 100644
> --- a/init/Kconfig
> +++ b/init/Kconfig
> @@ -463,13 +463,9 @@ endmenu # "CPU/Task time and stats accounting"
> 
>  menu "RCU Subsystem"
> 
> -choice
> -	prompt "RCU Implementation"
> -	default TREE_RCU
> -
>  config TREE_RCU
> -	bool "Tree-based hierarchical RCU"
> -	depends on !PREEMPT && SMP
> +	bool
> +	default y if !PREEMPT && SMP
>  	help
>  	  This option selects the RCU implementation that is
>  	  designed for very large SMP system with hundreds or
> @@ -477,8 +473,8 @@ config TREE_RCU
>  	  smaller systems.
> 
>  config PREEMPT_RCU
> -	bool "Preemptible tree-based hierarchical RCU"
> -	depends on PREEMPT
> +	bool
> +	default y if PREEMPT
>  	help
>  	  This option selects the RCU implementation that is
>  	  designed for very large SMP systems with hundreds or
> @@ -489,16 +485,14 @@ config PREEMPT_RCU
>  	  Select this option if you are unsure.
> 
>  config TINY_RCU
> -	bool "UP-only small-memory-footprint RCU"
> -	depends on !PREEMPT && !SMP
> +	bool
> +	default y if !PREEMPT && !SMP
>  	help
>  	  This option selects the RCU implementation that is
>  	  designed for UP systems from which real-time response
>  	  is not required.  This option greatly reduces the
>  	  memory footprint of RCU.
> 
> -endchoice
> -
>  config RCU_EXPERT
>  	bool "Make expert-level adjustments to RCU configuration"
>  	default n
> -- 
> 1.9.1
> 

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/