[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20150422152940.GC3007@worktop.Skamania.guest>
Date: Wed, 22 Apr 2015 17:29:40 +0200
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
viresh kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, linaro-kernel@...ts.linaro.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Steven Miao <realmz6@...il.com>,
shashim@...eaurora.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] timer: Avoid waking up an idle-core by migrate
running timer
On Tue, Apr 21, 2015 at 02:54:55PM -0700, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> On Tue, 2015-04-21 at 23:32 +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
>
> >
> > Are you realizing that __mod_timer() is a massive hotpath for network
> > heavy workloads?
>
> BTW I was considering using mod_timer_pinned() from these networking
> timers (ie sk_reset_timer())
>
> get_nohz_timer_target() sounds cool for laptop users, but is one cause
> for bad responses to DDOS, when the selected cpu gets stressed.
>
> This is the reason I used mod_timer_pinned() in commit 789f558cfb3680ae
> ("tcp/dccp: get rid of central timewait timer")
Hmm, that sounds unfortunate, this would wreck life for the power aware
laptop/tablet etc.. people.
There is already a sysctl to manage this, is that not enough to mitigate
this problem on the server side of things?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists