[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1828884A29C6694DAF28B7E6B8A82373A8FC6523@ORSMSX109.amr.corp.intel.com>
Date: Wed, 22 Apr 2015 16:54:50 +0000
From: "Hefty, Sean" <sean.hefty@...el.com>
To: "Weiny, Ira" <ira.weiny@...el.com>,
Michael Wang <yun.wang@...fitbricks.com>
CC: Jason Gunthorpe <jgunthorpe@...idianresearch.com>,
Roland Dreier <roland@...nel.org>,
"linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org" <linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"hal@....mellanox.co.il" <hal@....mellanox.co.il>,
Tom Tucker <tom@...ngridcomputing.com>,
Steve Wise <swise@...ngridcomputing.com>,
Hoang-Nam Nguyen <hnguyen@...ibm.com>,
Christoph Raisch <raisch@...ibm.com>,
infinipath <infinipath@...el.com>,
"Eli Cohen" <eli@...lanox.com>,
"Latif, Faisal" <faisal.latif@...el.com>,
"Jack Morgenstein" <jackm@....mellanox.co.il>,
Or Gerlitz <ogerlitz@...lanox.com>,
Haggai Eran <haggaie@...lanox.com>,
Tom Talpey <tom@...pey.com>, Doug Ledford <dledford@...hat.com>
Subject: RE: [PATCH v5 22/27] IB/Verbs: Use management helper cap_ipoib()
> > > I thought we were dropping this in favor of listing the actual
> > > features the ULP required unconditionally? One of my messages had the
> > > start of a list..
>
> ??? I forget. I was arguing that we should not have it. But I thought
> others
> disagreed with me so it was left in.
I don't remember, but I agree with Jason. The ULPs should check for the features that they need.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists