[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <5537EC31.7080808@intel.com>
Date: Wed, 22 Apr 2015 11:45:05 -0700
From: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...el.com>
To: Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@...el.com>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...ux.intel.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Asit K Mallick <asit.k.mallick@...el.com>,
Glenn Williamson <glenn.p.williamson@...el.com>
CC: linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, x86 <x86@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH Bugfix v2 2/4] x86/xsaves: Define and use user_xstate_size
for xstate size in signal context
On 04/21/2015 09:51 PM, Fenghua Yu wrote:
> + /*
> + * Copy rest of xstates in compact format to user.
> + */
> + for (i = 2; i < xstate_features; i++) {
> + if (test_bit(i, (unsigned long *)&pcntxt_mask)) {
> + int user_offset, kernel_offset;
> + int size;
> +
> + user_offset = xstate_offsets[i];
> + kernel_offset = xstate_comp_offsets[i];
> + size = xstate_sizes[i];
> +
> + if (__copy_to_user(buf_fx + user_offset,
> + xsave + kernel_offset, size))
> + return -1;
> + }
> + }
Is this checking the right bitmap?
The 'xsaves' documentation says: "If RFBM[i] = 1, XSTATE_BV[i] is set to
the value of XINUSE[i]". Where "XINUSE denotes the state-component
bitmap corresponding to the init optimization".
So shouldn't this be checking xsave->xsave_hdr.xstate_bv instead of
pcntxt_mask? The will be equal unless the "init optimization" is in play.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists