[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <553711C4.5050701@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Date: Wed, 22 Apr 2015 08:43:08 +0530
From: Preeti U Murthy <preeti@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
CC: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>,
Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatt@...hat.com>,
Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [patch 10/39] hrtimer: Use cpu_base->active_base for hotpath
iterators
On 04/21/2015 05:23 PM, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> On Mon, 20 Apr 2015, Preeti U Murthy wrote:
>
>> On 04/15/2015 02:38 AM, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
>>>> Now that we have the active_bases field in sync we can use it for
>>
>> This sentence appears a bit ambiguous. I am guessing you are referring
>> to what the first patch in this series did, in which case wouldn't it be
>> better if it is stated a bit more elaborately like 'Now that it is
>> guaranteed that active_bases field will be in sync with the timerqueue
>> on the corresponding clock base' ? It took me a while to figure out what
>> the statement was referring to.
>
> Indeed. I'm going to rephrase that.
Thanks.
Reviewed-by: Preeti U. Murthy <preeti@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
>
> Thanks,
>
> tglx
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists