[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20150422205602.GA15317@amt.cnet>
Date: Wed, 22 Apr 2015 17:56:02 -0300
From: Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@...hat.com>
To: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
gleb@...nel.org, kvm@...r.kernel.org,
Ralf Baechle <ralf@...ux-mips.org>, luto@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] First batch of KVM changes for 4.1
On Mon, Apr 20, 2015 at 06:59:04PM +0200, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
>
>
> On 17/04/2015 22:18, Marcelo Tosatti wrote:
> > The bug which this is fixing is very rare, have no memory of a report.
> >
> > In fact, its even difficult to create a synthetic reproducer.
>
> But then why was the task migration notifier even in Jeremy's original
> code for Xen?
To cover for the vcpu1 -> vcpu2 -> vcpu1 case, i believe.
> Was it supposed to work even on non-synchronized TSC?
Yes it is supposed to work on non-synchronized TSC.
> If that's the case, then it could be reverted indeed; but then why did
> you commit this patch to 4.1?
Because it fixes the problem Andy reported (see Subject: KVM: x86: fix
kvmclock write race (v2) on kvm@). As long as you have Radim's
fix on top.
> Did you think of something that would
> cause the seqcount-like protocol to fail, and that turned out not to be
> the case later? I was only following the mailing list sparsely in March.
No.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists