lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1429739711-9415-3-git-send-email-mcgrof@do-not-panic.com>
Date:	Wed, 22 Apr 2015 14:55:05 -0700
From:	"Luis R. Rodriguez" <mcgrof@...not-panic.com>
To:	rusty@...tcorp.com.au
Cc:	akpm@...ux-foundation.org, mingo@...nel.org, tj@...nel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org,
	keescook@...omium.org, casey@...aufler-ca.com,
	cocci@...teme.lip6.fr, "Luis R. Rodriguez" <mcgrof@...e.com>,
	Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@...el.com>
Subject: [PATCH v2 2/8] kernel/module.c: use generic module param operaters for sig_enforce

From: "Luis R. Rodriguez" <mcgrof@...e.com>

We're directly checking and modifying sig_enforce when needed instead
of using the generic helpers. This prevents us from generalizing this
helper so that others can use it. Use indirect helpers to allow us
to generalize this code a bit and to make it a bit more clear what
this is doing.

Cc: Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>
Cc: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@...el.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
Cc: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: cocci@...teme.lip6.fr
Signed-off-by: Luis R. Rodriguez <mcgrof@...e.com>
---
 kernel/module.c | 16 +++++++++-------
 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/module.c b/kernel/module.c
index 42a1d2a..de12c4a 100644
--- a/kernel/module.c
+++ b/kernel/module.c
@@ -114,23 +114,25 @@ static bool sig_enforce = false;
 static int param_set_bool_enable_only(const char *val,
 				      const struct kernel_param *kp)
 {
-	int err;
-	bool test;
+	int err = 0;
+	bool new_value;
+	bool orig_value = *(bool *)kp->arg;
 	struct kernel_param dummy_kp = *kp;
 
-	dummy_kp.arg = &test;
+	dummy_kp.arg = &new_value;
 
 	err = param_set_bool(val, &dummy_kp);
 	if (err)
 		return err;
 
 	/* Don't let them unset it once it's set! */
-	if (!test && sig_enforce)
+	if (!new_value && orig_value)
 		return -EROFS;
 
-	if (test)
-		sig_enforce = true;
-	return 0;
+	if (new_value)
+		err = param_set_bool(val, kp);
+
+	return err;
 }
 
 static const struct kernel_param_ops param_ops_bool_enable_only = {
-- 
2.3.2.209.gd67f9d5.dirty

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ