linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/2] timer: Avoid waking up an idle-core by migrate running timer

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <1429772251.22254.35.camel@edumazet-glaptop2.roam.corp.google.com>
Date:	Wed, 22 Apr 2015 23:57:31 -0700
From:	Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
To:	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Cc:	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
	viresh kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, linaro-kernel@...ts.linaro.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Steven Miao <realmz6@...il.com>,
	shashim@...eaurora.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] timer: Avoid waking up an idle-core by migrate
 running timer

On Wed, 2015-04-22 at 23:56 +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote:

> -int get_nohz_timer_target(int pinned)
> +int get_nohz_timer_target(void)
>  {
> -	int cpu = smp_processor_id();
> -	int i;
> +	int i, cpu = smp_processor_id();
>  	struct sched_domain *sd;
>  
> -	if (pinned || !get_sysctl_timer_migration() || !idle_cpu(cpu))
> +	if (!idle_cpu(cpu))
>  		return cpu;

Maybe also test in_serving_softirq() ?

if (in_serving_softirq() || !idle_cpu(cpu))
	return cpu;

There is a fundamental problem with networking load : Many cpus appear
to be idle from scheduler perspective because no user/kernel task is running.

CPUs servicing NIC queues can be very busy handling thousands of packets
per second, yet have no user/kernel task running.

idle_cpu() return code is : this cpu is idle.    hmmmm, really ?

cpus are busy, *and* have to access alien data/locks to activate timers
that hardly fire anyway.

When idle_cpu() finally gives the right indication, it is too late :
ksoftirqd might be running on the wrong cpu. Innocent cpus, overwhelmed
by a sudden timer load and locked into a service loop.

This cannot resist to a DOS, and even with non malicious traffic, the
overhead is high.

Thanks.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/