| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Thu, 23 Apr 2015 11:23:58 +0900
From: Minchan Kim <minchan@...nel.org>
To: Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@...il.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Nitin Gupta <ngupta@...are.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky.work@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCHv2 03/10] zram: use idr instead of `zram_devices' array
On Thu, Apr 16, 2015 at 08:55:49PM +0900, Sergey Senozhatsky wrote:
> This patch makes some preparations for on-demand device add/remove
> functionality.
>
> Remove `zram_devices' array and switch to id-to-pointer translation (idr).
> idr doesn't bloat zram struct with additional members, f.e. list_head,
> yet still provides ability to match the device_id with the device pointer.
>
> No user-space visible changes.
>
> [do not lose -ENOMEM return code when `queue' allocation has failed]
> Reported-by: Julia Lawall <Julia.Lawall@...6.fr>
> Signed-off-by: Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@...il.com>
> ---
> drivers/block/zram/zram_drv.c | 86 ++++++++++++++++++++++++-------------------
> 1 file changed, 49 insertions(+), 37 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/block/zram/zram_drv.c b/drivers/block/zram/zram_drv.c
> index 14043b2..4511830 100644
> --- a/drivers/block/zram/zram_drv.c
> +++ b/drivers/block/zram/zram_drv.c
> @@ -32,12 +32,12 @@
> #include <linux/string.h>
> #include <linux/vmalloc.h>
> #include <linux/err.h>
> +#include <linux/idr.h>
>
> #include "zram_drv.h"
>
> -/* Globals */
> +static DEFINE_IDR(zram_index_idr);
> static int zram_major;
> -static struct zram *zram_devices;
> static const char *default_compressor = "lzo";
>
> /* Module params (documentation at end) */
> @@ -1156,10 +1156,20 @@ static struct attribute_group zram_disk_attr_group = {
> .attrs = zram_disk_attrs,
> };
>
> -static int create_device(struct zram *zram, int device_id)
> +static int zram_add(int device_id)
> {
> + struct zram *zram;
> struct request_queue *queue;
> - int ret = -ENOMEM;
> + int ret;
> +
> + zram = kzalloc(sizeof(struct zram), GFP_KERNEL);
> + if (!zram)
> + return -ENOMEM;
> +
> + ret = idr_alloc(&zram_index_idr, zram, device_id,
> + device_id + 1, GFP_KERNEL);
> + if (ret < 0)
> + goto out_free_dev;
>
> init_rwsem(&zram->init_lock);
>
> @@ -1167,12 +1177,13 @@ static int create_device(struct zram *zram, int device_id)
> if (!queue) {
> pr_err("Error allocating disk queue for device %d\n",
> device_id);
> - goto out;
> + ret = -ENOMEM;
> + goto out_free_idr;
> }
>
> blk_queue_make_request(queue, zram_make_request);
>
> - /* gendisk structure */
> + /* gendisk structure */
> zram->disk = alloc_disk(1);
> if (!zram->disk) {
> pr_warn("Error allocating disk structure for device %d\n",
> @@ -1237,34 +1248,42 @@ out_free_disk:
> put_disk(zram->disk);
> out_free_queue:
> blk_cleanup_queue(queue);
> -out:
> +out_free_idr:
> + idr_remove(&zram_index_idr, device_id);
> +out_free_dev:
> + kfree(zram);
> return ret;
> }
>
> -static void destroy_devices(unsigned int nr)
> +static void zram_remove(struct zram *zram)
> {
> - struct zram *zram;
> - unsigned int i;
> -
> - for (i = 0; i < nr; i++) {
> - zram = &zram_devices[i];
> - /*
> - * Remove sysfs first, so no one will perform a disksize
> - * store while we destroy the devices
> - */
> - sysfs_remove_group(&disk_to_dev(zram->disk)->kobj,
> - &zram_disk_attr_group);
> + /*
> + * Remove sysfs first, so no one will perform a disksize
> + * store while we destroy the devices
> + */
> + sysfs_remove_group(&disk_to_dev(zram->disk)->kobj,
> + &zram_disk_attr_group);
>
> - zram_reset_device(zram);
> + zram_reset_device(zram);
> + idr_remove(&zram_index_idr, zram->disk->first_minor);
> + blk_cleanup_queue(zram->disk->queue);
> + del_gendisk(zram->disk);
> + put_disk(zram->disk);
> + kfree(zram);
> +}
>
> - blk_cleanup_queue(zram->disk->queue);
> - del_gendisk(zram->disk);
> - put_disk(zram->disk);
> - }
> +static int zram_exit_cb(int id, void *ptr, void *data)
trivial: I prefer remove to exit.
> +{
> + zram_remove(ptr);
> + return 0;
> +}
>
> - kfree(zram_devices);
> +static void destroy_devices(void)
> +{
> + idr_for_each(&zram_index_idr, &zram_exit_cb, NULL);
> + idr_destroy(&zram_index_idr);
> unregister_blkdev(zram_major, "zram");
> - pr_info("Destroyed %u device(s)\n", nr);
> + pr_info("Destroyed device(s)\n");
> }
>
> static int __init zram_init(void)
> @@ -1283,16 +1302,9 @@ static int __init zram_init(void)
> return -EBUSY;
> }
>
> - /* Allocate the device array and initialize each one */
> - zram_devices = kzalloc(num_devices * sizeof(struct zram), GFP_KERNEL);
> - if (!zram_devices) {
> - unregister_blkdev(zram_major, "zram");
> - return -ENOMEM;
> - }
> -
> for (dev_id = 0; dev_id < num_devices; dev_id++) {
> - ret = create_device(&zram_devices[dev_id], dev_id);
> - if (ret)
> + ret = zram_add(dev_id);
> + if (ret != 0)
It's better to check ret < 0 rather than ret != 0.
Otherwise,
Acked-by: Minchan Kim <minchan@...nel.org>
--
Kind regards,
Minchan Kim
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists