[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.44L0.1504231040560.1529-100000@iolanthe.rowland.org>
Date: Thu, 23 Apr 2015 10:44:44 -0400 (EDT)
From: Alan Stern <stern@...land.harvard.edu>
To: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>
cc: Magnus Damm <magnus.damm@...il.com>,
Linux-sh list <linux-sh@...r.kernel.org>,
Jason Cooper <jason@...edaemon.net>,
Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@...der.be>,
Linux PM list <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Simon Horman <horms@...ge.net.au>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH/RFC 00/03] irqchip: renesas-irqc: Fine grained Runtime
PM support
On Thu, 23 Apr 2015, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> >> I'm afraid you can't call pm_runtime_get_sync() from these methods, as
> >> they may be called from interrupt context.
> >
> > Ouch. I know the clock framework has prepare/enable separated with
> > context, but with the irqchip callbacks I suppose no such separation
>
> It's not the clock operations, but the pm_runtime operations that cannot be
> called from interrupt context.
In fact the pm_runtime operations _can_ be called from interrupt
context, provided the driver has first invoked pm_runtime_irq_safe().
Of course, this requires that none of the runtime-PM callback routines
ever sleep or perform a blocking operation.
This is all explained in Documentation/power/runtime_pm.txt (search for
"irq_safe").
Alan Stern
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists