[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CA+55aFxre3Jk-CG+mBs6Bp9a1J=riCQaA3dwUTFRph1OsCMSuA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 23 Apr 2015 09:13:34 -0700
From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Brian Gerst <brgerst@...il.com>
Cc: Denys Vlasenko <dvlasenk@...hat.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net>,
Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>,
Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>,
Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...mgrid.com>,
Will Drewry <wad@...omium.org>,
Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
"the arch/x86 maintainers" <x86@...nel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86/asm/entry/32: Restore %ss before SYSRETL if necessary
On Thu, Apr 23, 2015 at 9:06 AM, Brian Gerst <brgerst@...il.com> wrote:
>
> So you are saying we should save and conditionally restore the
> kernel's %ss during context switch? That shouldn't be too bad. Half
> of the time you would be loading the null selector which is fast (no
> GDT access, no validation).
I'd almost prefer something along those lines, yes. Who knows *what*
leaks? If the present bit state leaks, then likely so does the limit
value etc etc..
Linus
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists