[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <3E5A0FA7E9CA944F9D5414FEC6C712205C8CF9F8@ORSMSX106.amr.corp.intel.com>
Date: Thu, 23 Apr 2015 00:23:06 +0000
From: "Yu, Fenghua" <fenghua.yu@...el.com>
To: "Hansen, Dave" <dave.hansen@...el.com>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...ux.intel.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
"Mallick, Asit K" <asit.k.mallick@...el.com>,
"Williamson, Glenn P" <glenn.p.williamson@...el.com>
CC: linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, x86 <x86@...nel.org>
Subject: RE: [PATCH Bugfix v2 2/4] x86/xsaves: Define and use
user_xstate_size for xstate size in signal context
> From: Hansen, Dave
> Sent: Wednesday, April 22, 2015 5:21 PM
> To: Yu, Fenghua; H. Peter Anvin; Ingo Molnar; Thomas Gleixner; Mallick, Asit
> K; Williamson, Glenn P
> Cc: linux-kernel; x86
> Subject: Re: [PATCH Bugfix v2 2/4] x86/xsaves: Define and use
> user_xstate_size for xstate size in signal context
>
> On 04/22/2015 05:06 PM, Yu, Fenghua wrote:
> > Xsave->xsave_hdr.xstate_bv is equal to pcntxt_mask (see
> > setup_init_fpu_buf()).
>
> This is going to be a long thread. But, let's take it a step at a time.
>
> Do you agree that this earlier statement is incorrect?
The statement is incorrect. But the code is correct.
Thanks.
-Fenghua
Powered by blists - more mailing lists