linux-kernel - Re: [PATCHv2 10/10] zram: add dynamic device add/remove functionality

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAEwNFnCawQoGZr_gnK=jYnjEqJ=RL-2Sxn6zSHzsgbCskHtj6A@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Thu, 23 Apr 2015 12:12:27 +0900
From:	Minchan Kim <minchan@...nel.org>
To:	Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@...il.com>
Cc:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Nitin Gupta <ngupta@...are.org>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky.work@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCHv2 10/10] zram: add dynamic device add/remove functionality

On Thu, Apr 23, 2015 at 12:06 PM, Minchan Kim <minchan@...nel.org> wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 16, 2015 at 08:55:56PM +0900, Sergey Senozhatsky wrote:
>> We currently don't support on-demand device creation. The one and only way
>> to have N zram devices is to specify num_devices module parameter (default
>> value 1). That means that if, for some reason, at some point, user wants
>> to have N + 1 devies he/she must umount all the existing devices, unload
>> the module, load the module passing num_devices equals to N + 1. And do
>> this again, if needed.
>>
>> This patch introduces zram control sysfs class, which has two sysfs
>> attrs:
>> - zram_add      -- add a new zram device
>> - zram_remove   -- remove a specific (device_id) zram device
>>
>> zram_add sysfs attr is read-only and has only automatic device id assignment
>> mode (as requested by Minchan Kim). read operation performed on this attr
>> creates a new zram device and returns back its device_id or error status.
>>
>> Usage example:
>>       # add a new specific zram device
>>       cat /sys/class/zram-control/zram_add
>>       2
>>
>>       # remove a specific zram device
>>       echo 4 > /sys/class/zram-control/zram_remove
>>
>> Returning zram_add() error code back to user (-ENOMEM in this case)
>>
>>       cat /sys/class/zram-control/zram_add
>>       cat: /sys/class/zram-control/zram_add: Cannot allocate memory
>>
>> NOTE, there might be users who already depend on the fact that at
>> least zram0 device gets always created by zram_init(). Preserve this
>> behavior.
>>
>> [Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>: fix comment layout]
>> Reported-by: Minchan Kim <minchan@...nel.org>
>> Signed-off-by: Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@...il.com>
>> ---
>>  Documentation/ABI/testing/sysfs-class-zram |  24 ++++++
>>  Documentation/blockdev/zram.txt            |  23 +++++-
>>  drivers/block/zram/zram_drv.c              | 124 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
>>  3 files changed, 166 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>>  create mode 100644 Documentation/ABI/testing/sysfs-class-zram
>>
>> diff --git a/Documentation/ABI/testing/sysfs-class-zram b/Documentation/ABI/testing/sysfs-class-zram
>> new file mode 100644
>> index 0000000..6f62ef5
>> --- /dev/null
>> +++ b/Documentation/ABI/testing/sysfs-class-zram
>> @@ -0,0 +1,24 @@
>> +What:                /sys/class/zram-control/
>> +Date:                August 2015
>> +KernelVersion:       4.1
>> +Contact:     Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@...il.com>
>> +Description:
>> +             The zram-control/ class sub-directory belongs to zram
>> +             device class
>> +
>> +What:                /sys/class/zram-control/zram_add
>> +Date:                August 2015
>> +KernelVersion:       4.1
>> +Contact:     Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@...il.com>
>> +Description:
>> +             RO attribute. Read operation will cause zram to add a new
>> +             device and return its device id back to user (so one can
>> +             use /dev/zram<id>), or error code.
>> +
>> +What:                /sys/class/zram-control/zram_add
>> +Date:                August 2015
>> +KernelVersion:       4.1
>> +Contact:     Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@...il.com>
>> +Description:
>> +             Remove a specific /dev/zramX device, where X is a device_id
>> +             provided by user
>> diff --git a/Documentation/blockdev/zram.txt b/Documentation/blockdev/zram.txt
>> index 2ccc741..44b1a77 100644
>> --- a/Documentation/blockdev/zram.txt
>> +++ b/Documentation/blockdev/zram.txt
>> @@ -99,7 +99,24 @@ size of the disk when not in use so a huge zram is wasteful.
>>       mkfs.ext4 /dev/zram1
>>       mount /dev/zram1 /tmp
>>
>> -7) Stats:
>> +7) Add/remove zram devices
>> +
>> +zram provides a control interface, which enables dynamic (on-demand) device
>> +addition and removal.
>> +
>> +In order to add a new /dev/zramX device, perform read operation on zram_add
>> +attribute. This will return either new device's device id (meaning that you
>> +can use /dev/zram<id>) or error code.
>> +
>> +Example:
>> +     cat /sys/class/zram-control/zram_add
>
> Why do we put zram-contol there rather than /sys/block/zram

Forget this. I tried to remove the comment but sent by mistake.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/