linux-kernel - Re: [GIT PULL] kdbus for 4.1-rc1

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CALCETrXAGgJb2pC8o0gTJ9cc9XZ_2od=KQbd_oGS70EWOwZ0Xg@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Thu, 23 Apr 2015 12:22:10 -0700
From:	Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net>
To:	Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Cc:	One Thousand Gnomes <gnomes@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>,
	Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Tom Gundersen <teg@...m.no>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Jiri Kosina <jkosina@...e.cz>,
	David Herrmann <dh.herrmann@...il.com>,
	"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Djalal Harouni <tixxdz@...ndz.org>,
	Daniel Mack <daniel@...que.org>
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] kdbus for 4.1-rc1

On Apr 23, 2015 11:56 AM, "Greg Kroah-Hartman"
<gregkh@...uxfoundation.org> wrote:
>
> On Thu, Apr 23, 2015 at 11:04:36AM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> > On Thu, Apr 23, 2015 at 10:57 AM, Linus Torvalds
> > <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org> wrote:
> > >
> > > If somebody is printing something, it shouldn't matter if it's "lpr"
> > > or "firefox http://horses.and.trannyporn.my.little.pony.com/" that
> > > does the printing.
> >
> > And btw, it's not just "this is information that shouldn't be logged".
> >
> > It's literally "information that should not *ever* be used". I can
> > easily see some phone manufacturer deciding to do "value add" by
> > adding a special case where a special vendor system manager program
> > gets a back door to some service, because it needs to access the
> > camera for user identification at login time, so there's some magic
> >
> >    if (!strcmp(client->pid_comm, "vendor-login-pr"))
> >        return ACCESS_OK;
> >
> > because "it was the simplest way to do this", and the programmer knew
> > it was a hack, but he needed to get it working because he had a
> > deadline yesterday.
> >
> > And then somebody figures this out, and makes an app that takes
> > pictures on your phone surreptitiously.
> >
> > No, we can't protect against vendors doing stupid things, but we very
> > much also shouldn't make the kernel have interfaces that basically
> > encourage people to do stupid things because they make irrelevant and
> > wrongheaded data available.
>
> Doing access control based on comm and cmdline is horrid, I totally
> agree.  But right now, any process in the system can read any other
> process's comm and cmdline value out of /proc today.  So removing it
> from the metadata is fine for kdbus, I can live with that, but it really
> isn't "preventing" anything that's not already visible to everyone, so
> if someone wanting to be "bad" could always still log it or do anything
> else they wanted with it.

I feel like a broken record.  This isn't true in general.  Selinux can
and, I believe, often does prevent this.

--Andy
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/