[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <55396617.4020303@zytor.com>
Date: Thu, 23 Apr 2015 14:37:27 -0700
From: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
To: Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
Denys Vlasenko <vda.linux@...glemail.com>
CC: Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Brian Gerst <brgerst@...il.com>,
Denys Vlasenko <dvlasenk@...hat.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>,
Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>,
Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...mgrid.com>,
Will Drewry <wad@...omium.org>,
Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
the arch/x86 maintainers <x86@...nel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86/asm/entry/32: Restore %ss before SYSRETL if necessary
On 04/23/2015 02:10 PM, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 23, 2015 at 10:01:16PM +0200, Denys Vlasenko wrote:
>> Naturally, CS can't be NULL, and up until today
>> I thought SS also can't. But the bit is probably implemented
>> for all eight cached descriptors.
>
> There's this section about NULL selector in APM v2. It says that NULL
> selectors are used to invalidate segment registers and software can load
> a NULL selector in SS in CPL0.
>
> So, if an interrupt happens and as you quoted earlier that SS gets set
> to NULL as a result of an interrupt, there's that SS leak causing the SS
> exception.
>
Yes, the NULL SS is a special thing in 64-bit mode. I agree that
context-switching it is probably the way to go; it should be cheap
enough. We might even be able to conditionalize it on an X86_BUG_ flag.
-hpa
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists