[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <3908561D78D1C84285E8C5FCA982C28F32A6478B@ORSMSX114.amr.corp.intel.com>
Date: Thu, 23 Apr 2015 22:26:18 +0000
From: "Luck, Tony" <tony.luck@...el.com>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Zhang Zhen <zhenzhang.zhang@...wei.com>
CC: Linux MM <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux@....linux.org.uk" <linux@....linux.org.uk>,
"catalin.marinas@....com" <catalin.marinas@....com>,
"james.hogan@...tec.com" <james.hogan@...tec.com>,
"ralf@...ux-mips.org" <ralf@...ux-mips.org>,
"benh@...nel.crashing.org" <benh@...nel.crashing.org>,
"schwidefsky@...ibm.com" <schwidefsky@...ibm.com>,
"cmetcalf@...hip.com" <cmetcalf@...hip.com>,
"David Rientjes" <rientjes@...gle.com>,
"James.Yang@...escale.com" <James.Yang@...escale.com>,
"aneesh.kumar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com" <aneesh.kumar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Subject: RE: [PATCH] mm/hugetlb: reduce arch dependent code about
huge_pmd_unshare
> Memory fails me. Why do some architectures (arm, arm64, x86_64) want
> huge_pmd_[un]share() while other architectures (ia64, tile, mips,
> powerpc, metag, sh, s390) do not?
Potentially laziness/ignorance-of-feature? It looks like this feature started on x86_64 and then spread
to arm*.
Huge pages are weird on ia64 in that they have to be in a specific range of virtual addresses (region 4).
But I don't see why that would prevent sharing pmd's.
-Tony
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists