[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAK1hOcNNvaoei-y_s1VgH2B5CVW=xMmZy5Tcx2sF8j-k8vUwNg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 24 Apr 2015 01:22:46 +0200
From: Denys Vlasenko <vda.linux@...glemail.com>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
Brian Gerst <brgerst@...il.com>,
Denys Vlasenko <dvlasenk@...hat.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>,
Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>,
Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...mgrid.com>,
Will Drewry <wad@...omium.org>,
Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
"the arch/x86 maintainers" <x86@...nel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86/asm/entry/32: Restore %ss before SYSRETL if necessary
On Fri, Apr 24, 2015 at 1:04 AM, Linus Torvalds
<torvalds@...ux-foundation.org> wrote:
> And at that point,> the only cost is a a single no-op on most CPU's (we still don't know
> _which_ AMD CPU's are affected, but I guess we could start off with
> all of them and see if we can get an exhaustive list some way).
This seems to be "architectural" for AMD CPU's, similar to Intel's
SYSRET bug with non-canonical return address. Meaning,
both bugs, are documented by respective
companies. Both are officially "not a bug, but a feature".
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists