linux-kernel - RE: [v6] kvm/fpu: Enable fully eager restore kvm FPU

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <A9667DDFB95DB7438FA9D7D576C3D87E0ACBB8B3@SHSMSX104.ccr.corp.intel.com>
Date:	Fri, 24 Apr 2015 08:08:06 +0000
From:	"Zhang, Yang Z" <yang.z.zhang@...el.com>
To:	Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>,
	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
	"Hansen, Dave" <dave.hansen@...el.com>,
	"Li, Liang Z" <liang.z.li@...el.com>,
	"kvm@...r.kernel.org" <kvm@...r.kernel.org>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
CC:	"gleb@...nel.org" <gleb@...nel.org>,
	"mtosatti@...hat.com" <mtosatti@...hat.com>,
	"tglx@...utronix.de" <tglx@...utronix.de>,
	"mingo@...hat.com" <mingo@...hat.com>,
	"x86@...nel.org" <x86@...nel.org>,
	"joro@...tes.org" <joro@...tes.org>,
	"Hao, Xudong" <xudong.hao@...el.com>
Subject: RE: [v6] kvm/fpu: Enable fully eager restore kvm FPU

Paolo Bonzini wrote on 2015-04-24:
> 
> 
> On 24/04/2015 09:46, Zhang, Yang Z wrote:
>>> On the other hand vmexit is lighter and lighter on newer
>>> processors; a Sandy Bridge has less than half the vmexit cost of a
>>> Core 2 (IIRC
>>> 1000 vs. 2500 clock cycles approximately).
>> 
>> 1000 cycles? I remember it takes about 4000 cycle even in HSW server.
> 
> I was going from memory, but I now measured it with the vmexit test of
> kvm-unit-tests.  With both SNB Xeon E5 and IVB Core i7, returns about
> 1400 clock cycles for a vmcall exit.  This includes the overhead of
> doing the cpuid itself.
> 
> Thus the vmexit cost is around 1300 cycles.  Of this the vmresume
> instruction is probably around 800 cycles, and the rest is introduced
> by KVM.  There are at least 4-5 memory barriers and locked instructions.

Yes, that's make sense. The average vmexit/vmentry handle cost is around 4000 cycles. But I guess xsaveopt doesn't take so many cycles. Does anyone have the xsaveopt cost data?

> 
> Paolo


Best regards,
Yang


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/