[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1429863912.2927.43.camel@x220>
Date: Fri, 24 Apr 2015 10:25:12 +0200
From: Paul Bolle <pebolle@...cali.nl>
To: Feng Kan <fkan@....com>
Cc: patches@....com, jassisinghbrar@...il.com,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH V2 1/4] mailbox: add support for APM X-Gene platform
mailbox driver
On Wed, 2015-04-22 at 15:18 -0700, Feng Kan wrote:
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/drivers/mailbox/mailbox-xgene-slimpro.c
> +static struct platform_driver slimpro_mbox_driver = {
> + .probe = slimpro_mbox_probe,
> + .remove = slimpro_mbox_remove,
> + .driver = {
> + .name = "xgene-slimpro-mbox",
> + .owner = THIS_MODULE,
> + .of_match_table = of_match_ptr(slimpro_of_match),
> + },
> +};
> +
> +static int __init slimpro_mbox_init(void)
> +{
> + return platform_driver_register(&slimpro_mbox_driver);
> +}
> +
> +subsys_initcall(slimpro_mbox_init);
After a quick scan of this driver you'd expect something like
static void __exit slimpro_mbox_exit(void)
{
platform_driver_unregister(&slimpro_mbox_driver);
}
module_exit(slimpro_mbox_exit);
too here. At least, I do. Is there some non-obvious (to me) reason this
driver can't be unloaded if it is built as a module?
> +MODULE_DESCRIPTION("APM X-Gene SLIMpro Mailbox Driver");
> +MODULE_LICENSE("GPL");
Thanks,
Paul Bolle
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists