[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.LNX.2.00.1504241126430.3695@pobox.suse.cz>
Date: Fri, 24 Apr 2015 11:27:30 +0200 (CEST)
From: Jiri Kosina <jkosina@...e.cz>
To: AKASHI Takahiro <takahiro.akashi@...aro.org>
cc: rostedt@...dmis.org, mingo@...nel.org, jpoimboe@...hat.com,
sjenning@...hat.com, vojtech@...e.cz, catalin.marinas@....com,
will.deacon@....com, broonie@...nel.org,
masami.hiramatsu.pt@...achi.com, live-patching@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linaro-kernel@...ts.linaro.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC 0/4] arm64: add livepatch support
On Fri, 24 Apr 2015, AKASHI Takahiro wrote:
> This patchset enables livepatch support on arm64.
>
> Livepatch was merged in v4.0, and allows replacying a function dynamically
> based on ftrace framework, but it also requires -mfentry option of gcc.
> Currently arm64 gcc doesn't support it, but by adding a helper function to
> ftrace, we will be able to support livepatch on arch's which don't support
> this option.
>
> I submit this patchset as RFC since I'm not quite sure that I'm doing
> in the right way, or we should definitely support -fentry instead.
I don't have arm64 cross-compiler handy, could you please copy/paste how
does function prologue, generated by gcc -pg on arm64 look like?
Thanks,
--
Jiri Kosina
SUSE Labs
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists