linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/4] tty: serial: 8250_mtk: Use devm_clk

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Fri, 24 Apr 2015 12:56:40 +0200
From:	Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@...il.com>
To:	Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@...gutronix.de>
Cc:	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
	linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org,
	"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org" 
	<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
	linux-serial@...r.kernel.org, Alan Cox <alan@...ux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] tty: serial: 8250_mtk: Use devm_clk_get

2015-04-24 12:53 GMT+02:00 Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@...il.com>:
> 2015-04-24 12:31 GMT+02:00 Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@...gutronix.de>:
>> On Fri, Apr 24, 2015 at 12:28:33PM +0200, Matthias Brugger wrote:
>>> 2015-04-23 10:51 GMT+02:00 Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@...gutronix.de>:
>>> > Just because of_clk_get() doesn't mean it should be used. Use devm_clk_get
>>> > which is the correct function when a struct device * is available. Also
>>> > since it's a devm function we can drop the calls to clk_put(). While at
>>> > it also fix a wrong debug message.
>>> >
>>> > Signed-off-by: Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@...gutronix.de>
>>> > ---
>>> >  drivers/tty/serial/8250/8250_mtk.c | 7 ++-----
>>> >  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>>> >
>>> > diff --git a/drivers/tty/serial/8250/8250_mtk.c b/drivers/tty/serial/8250/8250_mtk.c
>>> > index 7a11fac..c6901dc 100644
>>> > --- a/drivers/tty/serial/8250/8250_mtk.c
>>> > +++ b/drivers/tty/serial/8250/8250_mtk.c
>>> > @@ -131,18 +131,16 @@ static int mtk8250_probe_of(struct platform_device *pdev, struct uart_port *p,
>>> >                            struct mtk8250_data *data)
>>> >  {
>>> >         int err;
>>> > -       struct device_node *np = pdev->dev.of_node;
>>> >
>>> > -       data->uart_clk = of_clk_get(np, 0);
>>> > +       data->uart_clk = devm_clk_get(&pdev->dev, NULL);
>>> >         if (IS_ERR(data->uart_clk)) {
>>> > -               dev_warn(&pdev->dev, "Can't get timer clock\n");
>>> > +               dev_warn(&pdev->dev, "Can't get uart clock\n");
>>> >                 return PTR_ERR(data->uart_clk);
>>> >         }
>>> >
>>> >         err = clk_prepare_enable(data->uart_clk);
>>> >         if (err) {
>>> >                 dev_warn(&pdev->dev, "Can't prepare clock\n");
>>> > -               clk_put(data->uart_clk);
>>> >                 return err;
>>> >         }
>>> >         p->uartclk = clk_get_rate(data->uart_clk);
>>> > @@ -216,7 +214,6 @@ static int mtk8250_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
>>> >         serial8250_unregister_port(data->line);
>>> >         if (!IS_ERR(data->uart_clk)) {
>>> >                 clk_disable_unprepare(data->uart_clk);
>>> > -               clk_put(data->uart_clk);
>>> >         }
>>>
>>> Please delete the braces.
>>
>> The if() is removed completly in the next patch anyway.
>
> You are right. I propose to merge patch 2 and 3, so you get a clean code.
> On the way, can you have a look on the commit message? For me it is
> not clear what you want to say.

Actually I meant patch 1 and 2 of the series. Sorry for the confusion.


-- 
motzblog.wordpress.com
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/